Helming_2011c.pdf 1,24MB
1000 Titel
  • Ex Ante Impact Assessment of Policies Affecting Land Use, Part B: Application of the Analytical Framework
1000 Autor/in
  1. Helming, Katharina |
  2. Diehl, Katharina |
  3. Kuhlman, Tom |
  4. Jansson, Torbjörn |
  5. Verburg, Peter H. |
  6. Bakker, Martha |
  7. Perez-Soba, Marta |
  8. Jones, Laurence |
  9. Verkerk, Pieter Johannes |
  10. Tabbush, Paul |
  11. Morris, Jake Breton |
  12. Drillet, Zuzana |
  13. Farrington, John |
  14. LeMouël, Pierre |
  15. Zagame, Paul |
  16. Stuczynski, Tomasz |
  17. Siebielec, Grzegorz |
  18. Sieber, Stefan |
  19. Wiggering, Hubert |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2011
1000 LeibnizOpen
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2011
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 16(1): 29
1000 FRL-Sammlung
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2011
1000 Verlagsversion
  • |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Begutachtungsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • The use of science-based tools for impact assessment has increasingly gained focus in addressing the complexity of interactions between environment, society, and economy. For integrated assessment of policies affecting land use, an analytical framework was developed. The aim of our work was to apply the analytical framework for specific scenario cases and in combination with quantitative and qualitative application methods. The analytical framework was tested for two cases involving the ex ante impact assessment of: (1) a European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) financial reform scenario employing a modeling approach and combined with a comprehensive indicator analysis and valuation; and (2) a regional bioenergy policy scenario, employing a fully participatory approach. The results showed that European land use in general is less sensitive to changes in the Common Agricultural Policy, but in the context of regions there can be significant impacts on the functions of land use. In general, the implementation of the analytical framework for impact assessment proved to be doable with both methods, i.e., with the quantitative modeling and with the qualitative participatory approach. A key advantage of using the system of linked quantitative models is that it makes possible the simultaneous consideration of all relevant sectors of the economy without abstaining from a great level of detail for sectors of particular interest. Other advantages lie in the incontestable character of the results. Based on neutral, existing data with a fixed set of settings and regions, an absolute comparability and reproducibility throughout Europe can be maintained. Analyzing the pros and cons of both approaches showed that they could be used complementarily rather than be seen as competing alternatives.
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal analytical framework
lokal ex ante impact assessment
lokal sustainability
lokal model-based tools
lokal policy development
lokal discussion tools
lokal participatory assessment tools
lokal land-use change
lokal DPSIR framework
1000 Fächerklassifikation (DDC)
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
1000 Label
1000 Fördernummer
  1. -
1000 Förderprogramm
  1. -
1000 Dateien
  1. Nutzungsvereinbarung
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6402380.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2017-05-11T09:22:05.756+0200
1000 Erstellt von 25
1000 beschreibt frl:6402380
1000 Bearbeitet von 218
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet Wed Nov 25 15:48:43 CET 2020
1000 Objekt bearb. Wed Nov 25 15:48:42 CET 2020
1000 Vgl. frl:6402380
1000 Oai Id
  1. |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source