Download
Machine learning in crop yield modelling. A powerful tool, but no surrogate for science.pdf 5,26MB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Machine learning in crop yield modelling: A powerful tool, but no surrogate for science
1000 Autor/in
  1. Lischeid, Gunnar |
  2. Webber, Heidi |
  3. Sommer, Michael |
  4. Nendel, Claas |
  5. Ewert, Frank |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2021
1000 LeibnizOpen
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2021-11-10
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 312:108698
1000 FRL-Sammlung
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2021
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108698 |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Begutachtungsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • Provisioning a sufficient stable source of food requires sound knowledge about current and upcoming threats to agricultural production. To that end machine learning approaches were used to identify the prevailing climatic and soil hydrological drivers of spatial and temporal yield variability of four crops, comprising 40 years yield data each from 351 counties in Germany. Effects of progress in agricultural management and breeding were subtracted from the data prior the machine learning modelling by fitting smooth non-linear trends to the 95th percentiles of observed yield data. An extensive feature selection approach was followed then to identify the most relevant predictors out of a large set of candidate predictors, comprising various soil and meteorological data. Particular emphasis was placed on studying the uniqueness of identified key predictors. Random Forest and Support Vector Machine models yielded similar although not identical results, capturing between 50% and 70% of the spatial and temporal variance of silage maize, winter barley, winter rapeseed and winter wheat yield. Equally good performance could be achieved with different sets of predictors. Thus identification of the most reliable models could not be based on the outcome of the model study only but required expert's judgement. Relationships between drivers and response often exhibited optimum curves, especially for summer air temperature and precipitation. In contrast, soil moisture clearly proved less relevant compared to meteorological drivers. In view of the expected climate change both excess precipitation and the excess heat effect deserve more attention in breeding as well as in crop modelling.
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Equivocality
lokal Machine learning
lokal Random forests
lokal Support vector machine
lokal Crop modelling
lokal Feature selection
1000 Fächerklassifikation (DDC)
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/TGlzY2hlaWQsIEd1bm5hcg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/V2ViYmVyLCBIZWlkaQ==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/U29tbWVyLCBNaWNoYWVs|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/TmVuZGVsLCBDbGFhcw==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/RXdlcnQsIEZyYW5r
1000 Label
1000 Fördernummer
  1. -
1000 Förderprogramm
  1. -
1000 Dateien
  1. Machine learning in crop yield modelling: A powerful tool, but no surrogate for science
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6430516.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2021-11-29T11:39:02.134+0100
1000 Erstellt von 321
1000 beschreibt frl:6430516
1000 Bearbeitet von 218
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet Sat Dec 24 12:41:52 CET 2022
1000 Objekt bearb. Sat Dec 24 12:41:52 CET 2022
1000 Vgl. frl:6430516
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6430516 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source