Download
s10584-021-03209-7.pdf 891,17KB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Global patterns of disaster and climate risk—an analysis of the consistency of leading index-based assessments and their results
1000 Autor/in
  1. Garschagen, Matthias |
  2. Doshi, Deepal |
  3. Reith, Jonathan |
  4. Hagenlocher, Michael |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2021
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2021-11-12
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 169(1-2):11
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2021
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03209-7 |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • Indices assessing country-level climate and disaster risk at the global scale have experienced a steep rise in popularity both in science and international climate policy. A number of widely cited products have been developed and published over the recent years, argued to contribute critical knowledge for prioritizing action and funding. However, it remains unclear how their results compare, and how consistent their findings are on country-level risk, exposure, vulnerability and lack of coping, as well as adaptive capacity. This paper analyses and compares the design, data, and results of four of the leading global climate and disaster risk indices: The World Risk Index, the INFORM Risk Index, ND-GAIN Index, and the Climate Risk Index. Our analysis clearly shows that there is considerable degree of cross-index variation regarding countries’ risk levels and comparative ranks. At the same time, there is above-average agreement for high-risk countries. In terms of risk sub-components, there is surprisingly little agreement in the results on hazard exposure, while strong inter-index correlations can be observed when ranking countries according to their socio-economic vulnerability and lack of coping as well as adaptive capacity. Vulnerability and capacity hotspots can hence be identified more robustly than risk and exposure hotspots. Our findings speak both to the potential as well as limitations of index-based approaches. They show that a solid understanding of index-based assessment tools, and their conceptual and methodological underpinnings, is necessary to navigate them properly and interpret as well as use their results in triangulation.
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Article
lokal Risk
lokal Disasters
lokal Risk assessment
lokal Climate policy
lokal Indicators
lokal Vulnerability assessment
lokal Climate change adaptation
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9492-4463|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9606-2809|https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3094-9228|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5254-6713
1000 Hinweis
  • DeepGreen-ID: a91d970f2c484430a54982f7a1fddf0f ; metadata provieded by: DeepGreen (https://www.oa-deepgreen.de/api/v1/), LIVIVO search scope life sciences (http://z3950.zbmed.de:6210/livivo), Crossref Unified Resource API (https://api.crossref.org/swagger-ui/index.html), to.science.api (https://frl.publisso.de/), ZDB JSON-API (beta) (https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/api/), lobid - Dateninfrastruktur für Bibliotheken (https://lobid.org/resources/search)
1000 Label
1000 Dateien
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6445062.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2023-04-28T09:13:49.106+0200
1000 Erstellt von 322
1000 beschreibt frl:6445062
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2023-10-20T14:36:51.192+0200
1000 Objekt bearb. Fri Oct 20 14:36:51 CEST 2023
1000 Vgl. frl:6445062
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6445062 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source