Download
s00481-021-00626-1.pdf 168,25KB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • „Are we doing alright?“ Die Komplexität ethisch-verantwortlicher Forschung zu sexueller Orientierung, geschlechtlicher Identität und Gesundheit im südlichen und östlichen Afrika
1000 Autor/in
  1. Müller, Alex |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2021
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2021-04-15
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 33(2):293-299
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2021
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s00481-021-00626-1 |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Definition</jats:title> <jats:p>The routinization of prenatal diagnosis is the source of bioethical and policy debates regarding choice, autonomy, access, and protection. To understand these debates in the context of cultural diversity and moral pluralism, we compare Israel and Germany, focusing on two recent repro-genetic “hot spots” of such policy-making at the beginning of life: pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and non-invasive prenatal genetic testing (NIPT), two cutting-edge repro-genetic technologies that are regulated and viewed very differently in Germany and Israel, reflecting different medicolegal policies as well as public and bioethical considerations.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Arguments</jats:title> <jats:p>First, we compare policy-making in the context of PGD for HLA (human leukocyte antigen) typing, used to create sibling donors, approved in Israel under specific conditions while prohibited in Germany. Second, we compare policy-making in the context of NIPT, which came under fire in Germany, while in Israel there has been little public debate about it.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>Both countries justify their contrasting policies as reflecting a concern for the well-being and care of the embryo/child, thus highlighting different concepts of embryo/child protection, (relational) autonomy, family relations, and the impact of religion and history on the promotion/protection of life. We use the juxtaposition of PGD and NIPT to highlight some inconsistencies in policies concerning the protection of extra- and intra-corporeal embryos. We conclude by drawing on the comparison to show how national variations exist alongside co-evolution.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Intensive / Critical Care Medicine
lokal Psychotherapy
lokal Gynecology
lokal Reproductive Medicine
lokal Aktuelles
lokal Medicine/Public Health, general
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/TcO8bGxlciwgQWxleA==
1000 Hinweis
  • DeepGreen-ID: 9f2559b1a066470ba7b43c285fe635b1 ; metadata provieded by: DeepGreen (https://www.oa-deepgreen.de/api/v1/), LIVIVO search scope life sciences (http://z3950.zbmed.de:6210/livivo), Crossref Unified Resource API (https://api.crossref.org/swagger-ui/index.html), to.science.api (https://frl.publisso.de/), ZDB JSON-API (beta) (https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/api/), lobid - Dateninfrastruktur für Bibliotheken (https://lobid.org/resources/search)
1000 Label
1000 Dateien
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6449680.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2023-05-09T09:47:17.480+0200
1000 Erstellt von 322
1000 beschreibt frl:6449680
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet Fri Oct 13 17:27:56 CEST 2023
1000 Objekt bearb. Fri Oct 13 17:27:56 CEST 2023
1000 Vgl. frl:6449680
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6449680 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source