Download
Partelow 2018b.pdf 665,50KB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • A review of the social-ecological systems framework: applications, methods, modifications, and challenges
1000 Autor/in
  1. Partelow, Stefan |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2018
1000 LeibnizOpen
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2018
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 23(4):36
1000 FRL-Sammlung
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2018
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10594-230436 |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Begutachtungsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • The social-ecological systems framework (SESF) is arguably the most comprehensive conceptual framework for diagnosing interactions and outcomes in social-ecological systems (SES). This article systematically reviews the literature applying and developing the SESF and discusses methodological challenges for its continued use and development. Six types of research approaches using the SESF are identified, as well as the context of application, types of data used, and commonly associated concepts. The frequency of how each second-tier variable is used across articles is analyzed. A summary list of indicators used to measure each second-tier variable is provided. Articles suggesting modifications to the framework are summarized and linked to the specific variables. The discussion reflects on the results and focuses on methodological challenges for applying the framework. First, how the SESF is historically related to commons and collective action research. This affects its continued development in relation to inclusion criteria for variable modification and discourse in the literature. The framework may evolve into separate modified versions for specific resource use sectors (e.g., forestry, fisheries, food production, etc.), and a general framework would aggregate the generalizable commonalities between them. Methodological challenges for applying the SESF are discussed related to research design, transparency, and cross-case comparison. These are referred to as “methodological gaps” that allow the framework to be malleable to context but create transparency, comparability, and data abstraction issues. These include the variable-definition gap, variable-indicator gap, the indicator-measurement gap, and the data transformation gap. A benefit of the framework has been its ability to be malleable and multipurpose, bringing a welcomed pluralism of methods, data, and associated concepts. However, pluralism creates challenges for synthesis, data comparison, and mutually agreed-upon methods for modifications. Databases are a promising direction forward to help solve this problem. In conclusion, future research is discussed by reflecting on the different ways the SESF may continue to be a useful tool through (1) being a general but adaptable framework, (2) enabling comparison, and (3) as a diagnostic tool for theory building.
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal commons
lokal frameworks
lokal sustainability
lokal collective action
lokal diagnostic research
lokal governance
1000 Fächerklassifikation (DDC)
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7751-4005
1000 Label
1000 Förderer
  1. Leibniz-Gemeinschaft |
1000 Fördernummer
  1. -
1000 Förderprogramm
  1. Open Access Fund
1000 Dateien
1000 Förderung
  1. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer Leibniz-Gemeinschaft |
    1000 Förderprogramm Open Access Fund
    1000 Fördernummer -
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6417900.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2019-12-09T13:01:03.155+0100
1000 Erstellt von 306
1000 beschreibt frl:6417900
1000 Bearbeitet von 25
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet Fri Jan 31 01:33:33 CET 2020
1000 Objekt bearb. Mon Dec 16 11:53:56 CET 2019
1000 Vgl. frl:6417900
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6417900 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source