Download
Nguyen_2018_Environ._Res._Lett._13_024002.pdf 5,09MB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Impact, efficiency, inequality, and injustice of urban air pollution: variability by emission location
1000 Autor/in
  1. Nguyen, Nam |
  2. Marshall, Julian |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2018
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2018-01-24
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 13(2):024002
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2018
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9cb5 |
1000 Ergänzendes Material
  • https://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/13/2/024002/media/ERL_13_2_024002_suppdata.pdf |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Begutachtungsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • Reducing exposure to air pollution is an important goal for many local and national governments. Disparities in air pollution exposure by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic class are well documented; reducing these disparities is another important policy target. Meeting both goals requires tools to evaluate how emission reduction options affect average exposures and exposure disparities. Here, we consider the role of emission location in implementing control strategies, and investigate the effect of two practical, space-based approaches—low-emission zones and truck rerouting—on diesel particle levels in Southern California. We employ Eulerian grid modeling to explore the impact that emission location has on four outcomes important to policymakers: total pollution exposure, exposure efficiency (i.e. exposure impact per unit emission), exposure inequality (i.e. deviations from exposure being equally distributed across the population; unequal exposure among individuals), and exposure injustice (i.e. associations between exposure and demographic attributes such as race or ethnicity; unequal exposure among groups). Our results highlight potential trade-offs (e.g. an increase in equality but reduction in justice for interventions in some locations) as well as opportunities for 'win-win' solutions (locations for which emission reductions would reduce all four target outcomes). We find that a simple, straightforward approach—reducing emissions in neighborhoods with a high proportion of minority residents—may or may not yield the strongest benefits to environmental justice; the reason is that the straightforward approach fails to account for meteorology and where pollution travels after being emitted. In short, we demonstrate an approach that can be used to identify areas in which emissions reductions would have high efficiency and would also result in disproportionately large reductions to average exposure, exposure inequality, and exposure injustice. The approach presented here could be used to design and prioritize local or national emission reduction efforts.
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal environmental justice
lokal environmental equality
lokal air pollution
lokal particulate matter
lokal diesel
1000 Fächerklassifikation (DDC)
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3695-2578|https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4087-1209
1000 Label
1000 Förderer
  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
1000 Fördernummer
  1. RD-83362401-0; RD83587301
1000 Förderprogramm
  1. STAR; ACE
1000 Dateien
1000 Förderung
  1. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
    1000 Förderprogramm STAR; ACE
    1000 Fördernummer RD-83362401-0; RD83587301
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6418503.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2020-01-14T14:08:14.279+0100
1000 Erstellt von 218
1000 beschreibt frl:6418503
1000 Bearbeitet von 218
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2020-01-30T17:43:21.730+0100
1000 Objekt bearb. Tue Jan 14 14:10:56 CET 2020
1000 Vgl. frl:6418503
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6418503 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source