Download
Buentjen.pdf 1,11MB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Long-term outcomes of semi-implantable functional electrical stimulation for central drop foot
1000 Autor/in
  1. Buentjen, Lars |
  2. Kupsch, Andreas |
  3. Galazky, Imke |
  4. Frantsev, Roman |
  5. Heinze, Hans-Jochen |
  6. Voges, Jürgen |
  7. Hausmann, Janet |
1000 Mitwirkende/r
  1. Sweeney-Reed, Catherine |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2019
1000 LeibnizOpen
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2019-06-11
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 16(1):72
1000 FRL-Sammlung
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2019
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0542-8 |
  • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560889/ |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Begutachtungsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • BACKGROUND: Central drop foot is a common problem in patients with stroke or multiple sclerosis (MS). For decades, it has been treated with orthotic devices, keeping the ankle in a fixed position. It has been shown recently that semi-implantable functional electrical stimulation (siFES) of the peroneal nerve can lead to a greater gait velocity increase than orthotic devices immediately after being switched on. Little is known, however, about long-term outcomes over 12 months, and the relationship between quality of life (QoL) and gait speed using siFES has never been reported applying a validated tool. We provide here a report of short (3 months) and long-term (12 months) outcomes for gait speed and QoL. METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients (91% chronic stroke, 9% MS) with central drop foot received siFES (Actigait®). A 10 m walking test was carried out on day 1 of stimulation (T1), in stimulation ON and OFF conditions, and repeated after 3 (T2) and 12 (T3) months. A 36-item Short Form questionnaire was applied at all three time points. RESULTS: We found a main effect of stimulation on both maximum (p < 0.001) and comfortable gait velocity (p < 0.001) and a main effect of time (p = 0.015) only on maximum gait velocity. There were no significant interactions. Mean maximum gait velocity across the three assessment time points was 0.13 m/s greater with stimulation ON than OFF, and mean comfortable gait velocity was 0.083 m/s faster with stimulation ON than OFF. The increase in maximum gait velocity over time was 0.096 m/s, with post hoc testing revealing a significant increase from T1 to T2 (p = 0.012), which was maintained but not significantly further increased at T3. QoL scores showed a main effect of time (p < 0.001), with post hoc testing revealing an increase from T1 to T2 (p < 0.001), which was maintained at T3 (p < 0.001). Finally, overall absolute QoL scores correlated with the absolute maximum and comfortable gait speeds at T2 and T3, and the increase in overall QoL scores correlated with the increase in comfortable gait velocity from T1 to T3. Pain was reduced at T2 (p < 0.001) and was independent of gait speed but correlated with overall QoL (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Peroneal siFES increased maximal and comfortable gait velocity and QoL, with the greatest increase in both over the first three months, which was maintained at one year, suggesting that 3 months is an adequate follow-up time. Pain after 3 months correlated with QoL and was independent of gait velocity, suggesting pain as an independent outcome measure in siFES for drop foot.
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Functional electrical stimulation
lokal Actigait
lokal Gait
lokal Foot drop
lokal Semi-implantable
lokal Peroneal nerve stimulation
1000 Fächerklassifikation (DDC)
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/QnVlbnRqZW4sIExhcnM=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/S3Vwc2NoLCBBbmRyZWFz|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/R2FsYXpreSwgSW1rZQ==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/RnJhbnRzZXYsIFJvbWFu|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/SGVpbnplLCBIYW5zLUpvY2hlbg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/Vm9nZXMsIErDvHJnZW4=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/SGF1c21hbm4sIEphbmV0|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3684-1245
1000 Label
1000 Förderer
  1. Ottobock |
1000 Fördernummer
  1. -
1000 Förderprogramm
  1. -
1000 Dateien
1000 Förderung
  1. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer Ottobock |
    1000 Förderprogramm -
    1000 Fördernummer -
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6419074.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2020-02-27T11:33:48.136+0100
1000 Erstellt von 242
1000 beschreibt frl:6419074
1000 Bearbeitet von 16
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2020-03-13T10:27:18.037+0100
1000 Objekt bearb. Fri Mar 13 10:27:17 CET 2020
1000 Vgl. frl:6419074
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6419074 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source