Download
journal.pone.0245907.pdf 625,69KB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Converting the maybes: Crucial for a successful COVID-19 vaccination strategy
1000 Autor/in
  1. Attwell, Kathryn Louise |
  2. Lake, Joshua |
  3. Sneddon, Joanne |
  4. Gerrans, Paul |
  5. Blyth, Chris |
  6. Lee, Julie |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2021
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2021-01-20
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 16(1):e0245907
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2021
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245907 |
  • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7817004/ |
1000 Ergänzendes Material
  • https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245907#sec012 |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Begutachtungsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • BACKGROUND: Broad community acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccination will be critical for effectively halting the spread of the virus. In this study, we focus on factors that differentiate those who are undecided from those who are either willing or unwilling to accept a prospective COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS: An online survey in May 2020 assessed Australian adults’ willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine (yes, maybe, no). A multinomial logistical regression of responses (N = 1,313) was used to identify correlates of vaccine willingness between the three groups. RESULTS: 65% were willing to vaccinate, with 27% being in the ‘maybe’ category. Respondents were more likely to be in the ‘maybe’ than the ‘yes’ group when they perceived COVID-19 to be less severe, had less trust in science, were less willing to vaccinate for influenza, and were female. They were more likely to be in the ‘maybe’ than ‘no’ group when they perceived COVID-19 as severe, and less likely to be a hoax, had more trust in science, and greater willingness to vaccinate for influenza. A repeat of the survey in November 2020 with a subset of participants found fewer of them saying yes to the vaccine (56%) and more saying maybe (31%). CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of any COVID-19 vaccine rollout will be reliant on maximizing uptake. The significant number of people who remain undecided about whether or not to get a COVID-19 vaccine, despite the ongoing devastating consequences of the virus for individuals, communities, and economies, is concerning. Our findings aid current research seeking to inform policy regarding how to convince the undecided to vaccinate.
1000 Sacherschließung
gnd 1206347392 COVID-19
lokal Vaccines
lokal Influenza
lokal Pandemics
lokal Virus testing
lokal Australia
lokal Vaccination and immunization
lokal Vaccine development
1000 Fächerklassifikation (DDC)
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0366-2160|https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9320-3402|https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7869-9649|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5690-7141|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/Qmx5dGgsIENocmlzIA==|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6896-5568
1000 Label
1000 Förderer
  1. Australian Research Council |
1000 Fördernummer
  1. DE190100158; LP150100434
1000 Förderprogramm
  1. Discovery Early Career Researcher Award; ARC Linkage Grant
1000 Dateien
1000 Förderung
  1. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer Australian Research Council |
    1000 Förderprogramm Discovery Early Career Researcher Award; ARC Linkage Grant
    1000 Fördernummer DE190100158; LP150100434
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6426929.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2021-04-19T13:26:29.345+0200
1000 Erstellt von 315
1000 beschreibt frl:6426929
1000 Bearbeitet von 25
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2021-05-17T08:55:34.254+0200
1000 Objekt bearb. Mon May 17 08:54:55 CEST 2021
1000 Vgl. frl:6426929
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6426929 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source