Download
Muellmann-et-al_2021_How many key informants.pdf 912,91KB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • How many key informants are enough? Analysing the validity of the community readiness assessment
1000 Autor/in
  1. Muellmann, Saskia |
  2. Brand, Tilman |
  3. Jürgens, Dorothee |
  4. Gansefort, Dirk |
  5. Zeeb, Hajo |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2021
1000 LeibnizOpen
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2021-03-09
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 14:85
1000 FRL-Sammlung
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2021
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05497-9 |
  • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941941/ |
1000 Ergänzendes Material
  • https://bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13104-021-05497-9#Sec10 |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Begutachtungsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • OBJECTIVE: Communities are important settings for health promotion and prevention. The community readiness assessment offers a structured approach to assess resources and opportunities to tackle a health problem within a community. The assessment relies on semi-structured interviews with key informants from the communities. A number of 4–6 key informant interviews are recommended in the literature. However, it is unclear whether this is sufficient to obtain a valid representation of the respective community. This study analysed whether increasing the number of key informants from 4–6 to 12–15 alters the results of the community readiness assessment. RESULTS: A total of 55 community readiness interviews were carried out in 4 communities. Overall, the community readiness scores showed little variation after having interviewed 10 key informants in a community. However, even after completing 10 interviews in a community, key informants were still able to identify up to 6 new information items regarding community efforts for physical activity promotion among the elderly, contact and communication channel for informing or approaching the target group, or barriers to participation.
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Assessment
lokal Validity
lokal Community readiness
lokal Key informants
lokal Community-based health promotion
1000 Fächerklassifikation (DDC)
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8650-8395|https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5140-7511|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/SsO8cmdlbnMsIERvcm90aGVl|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0281-9568|https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7509-242X
1000 Label
1000 Förderer
  1. Projekt DEAL |
  2. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung |
1000 Fördernummer
  1. -
  2. 01EL1822A
1000 Förderprogramm
  1. Open Access funding
  2. -
1000 Dateien
1000 Förderung
  1. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer Projekt DEAL |
    1000 Förderprogramm Open Access funding
    1000 Fördernummer -
  2. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung |
    1000 Förderprogramm -
    1000 Fördernummer 01EL1822A
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6429425.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2021-09-20T12:49:25.758+0200
1000 Erstellt von 266
1000 beschreibt frl:6429425
1000 Bearbeitet von 25
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet Wed Sep 22 09:21:26 CEST 2021
1000 Objekt bearb. Mon Sep 20 12:51:44 CEST 2021
1000 Vgl. frl:6429425
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6429425 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source