Download
s11625-021-01028-4.pdf 1,84MB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Beyond practitioner and researcher: 15 roles adopted by actors in transdisciplinary and transformative research processes
1000 Autor/in
  1. Hilger, Annaliesa |
  2. Rose, Michael |
  3. Keil, Andreas |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2021
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2021-10-18
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 16(6):2049-2068
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2021
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01028-4 |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • To tackle complex sustainability problems, science and practice must join forces and interact in the processes of knowledge co-production. This central claim of sustainability science requires all actors to do more than simply participate in a workshop or carry out traditional research. It is essential to provide clarity to actors about the roles to adopt in these processes, especially in terms of planning collaborations—with whom, when, and how. Therefore, in this paper we identify, describe, and discuss 15 roles for actors involved in such processes. We undertook a systematic literature review to identify papers with precise descriptions of transdisciplinary (td) and transformative (tf) research processes. We focused on the common occurrence of activities undertaken by actors by applying 72 activity codes a total of 549 times. Subclusters of activities were identified by means of a hierarchical cluster analysis and these were condensed into 15 roles. The roles can be categorised in four activity realms: field, academia, boundary management, and knowledge co-production. The roles of the Data Supplier, the Field Expert, and the Application Expert are adopted by actors who originate from the field, whereas the roles of the Scientific Analyst and the Knowledge Collector are primarily adopted by researchers. Furthermore, we identified 10 roles within the activity realms of the knowledge co-production process and boundary management. The high number and diversity of roles, especially in the realm of boundary management, reveals the importance of a comprehensive approach to coordination, communication, and process design.
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Knowledge co-production
lokal Systematic review
lokal Review Article
lokal Concepts, Methodology, and Knowledge Management for Sustainability Science
lokal Boundary management
lokal Stakeholder
lokal Role descriptions
lokal Non-scientific actors
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1479-1638|https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5812-467X|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/S2VpbCwgQW5kcmVhcw==
1000 Hinweis
  • DeepGreen-ID: ced12334e4814b71a44563cdfc0729c0 ; metadata provieded by: DeepGreen (https://www.oa-deepgreen.de/api/v1/), LIVIVO search scope life sciences (http://z3950.zbmed.de:6210/livivo), Crossref Unified Resource API (https://api.crossref.org/swagger-ui/index.html), to.science.api (https://frl.publisso.de/), ZDB JSON-API (beta) (https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/api/), lobid - Dateninfrastruktur für Bibliotheken (https://lobid.org/resources/search)
1000 Label
1000 Dateien
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6445736.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2023-04-28T11:10:07.844+0200
1000 Erstellt von 322
1000 beschreibt frl:6445736
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2023-10-20T16:25:44.827+0200
1000 Objekt bearb. Fri Oct 20 16:25:44 CEST 2023
1000 Vgl. frl:6445736
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6445736 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source