|
1000
|
Abstract/Summary
|
-
Background!#!The fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) is considered to be an indispensable instrumental procedure in the management of patients with dysphagia. The aim of the implemented training curriculum is to raise the quality standards and to contribute to an upgrading of the procedure.!##!Objective!#!The study evaluated to what extent a standardized implementation, evaluation and documentation of FEES takes place in Germany after the introduction of the curriculum.!##!Material and methods!#!In this study 603 neurological and geriatric hospitals in Germany were interviewed by the use of an online questionnaire regarding structural features and the course of the investigation.!##!Results!#!A total of 190 institutions completed the survey. Of the institutions 43.31% had only implemented FEES since the publication of the curriculum. The practical application is increasingly carried out by physicians (59%), the clinical reports and cost recommendations are carried out by speech therapists (62% and 83%, respectively). The practical application by speech therapists increases with increasing level of training. Despite orientation towards the standard protocol according to Langmore, there are differences in the implementation of the anatomical physiological examination, the consistencies and foods administered and the scoring of swallowing-relevant parameters.!##!Discussion!#!The introduction of the curriculum has led to an upgrading of the FEES and to a strengthening of speech therapy as the implementing professional group. At the current state of the art there is a homogeneous course of the examination in essential aspects but it shows a need for further uniformity. The FEES curriculum could be used as a guiding instrument for further standardization.
|
|
1000
|
Hinweis
|
-
DeepGreen-ID: e8dd02cbca4848ea8ec15dbbbe3bbc94 ; metadata provieded by: DeepGreen (https://www.oa-deepgreen.de/api/v1/), LIVIVO search scope life sciences (http://z3950.zbmed.de:6210/livivo), Crossref Unified Resource API (https://api.crossref.org/swagger-ui/index.html), to.science.api (https://frl.publisso.de/), ZDB JSON-API (beta) (https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/api/), lobid - Dateninfrastruktur für Bibliotheken (https://lobid.org/resources/search)
|
