Download
s00784-021-04006-3.pdf 1,91MB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Cephalometric analyses for cleft patients: a statistical approach to compare the variables of Delaire’s craniofacial analysis to Bergen analysis
1000 Autor/in
  1. Doberschütz, Philine |
  2. Schwahn, Christian |
  3. Krey, Karl-Friedrich |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2021
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2021-05-29
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 26(1):353-364
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2021
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04006-3 |
  • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8791903/ |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • Objectives!#!Cephalometric analyses using lateral craniofacial radiographs are common diagnostic procedures for evaluating skeletal patterns. However, in patients with pronounced abnormalities like cleft lip and palate, standard cephalometric analyses and landmarks may not be suitable. This study aims to clarify whether the inclusion of landmarks less compromised by the cleft defect or located outside the cleft area results in a different cephalometric assessment of the viscerocranium. Delaire's whole-skull analysis and Bergen analysis were examined for similarities and underlying common observations.!##!Materials/methods!#!Based on the cephalometric evaluation of 217 patients with different types of non-syndromal cleft formation, Delaire and Bergen analysis were compared using three statistical methods: correlation analysis, factor analysis, and cluster analysis. Reproducibility was assessed by Bland-Altman plots, intraclass correlation coefficients, mean absolute differences, and coefficients of variability.!##!Results!#!Although Delaire analysis and Bergen analysis are based on different concepts and landmarks, a majority of corresponding variables was found. Certain aspects of craniofacial base relation and craniospinal articulation are only assessed by Delaire analysis. All but one variable showed very good reproducibility.!##!Conclusions!#!The inclusion of landmarks less compromised by or located outside the cleft area does not result in variables that provide a different assessment of the viscerocranial area.!##!Clinical relevance!#!The findings contradict the concept of invalidity of landmarks compromised by the cleft defect or located within the affected cleft area. Within the scope of its viscerocranial field of view, Bergen analysis appears to be on a par with Delaire analysis in the diagnosis of cleft patients.
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Cleft lip and palate
lokal Cephalometry [MeSH]
lokal Humans [MeSH]
lokal Cleft Lip/diagnostic imaging [MeSH]
lokal Correlation analysis
lokal Factor analysis
lokal Original Article
lokal Skull [MeSH]
lokal Reproducibility of Results [MeSH]
lokal Delaire analysis
lokal Cleft Palate/diagnostic imaging [MeSH]
lokal Cephalometry
lokal Cluster analysis
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1120-8398|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/U2Nod2FobiwgQ2hyaXN0aWFu|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/S3JleSwgS2FybC1GcmllZHJpY2g=
1000 Hinweis
  • DeepGreen-ID: 91c67a10acfe4e8eb8d6b7cdcfbb3ec7 ; metadata provieded by: DeepGreen (https://www.oa-deepgreen.de/api/v1/), LIVIVO search scope life sciences (http://z3950.zbmed.de:6210/livivo), Crossref Unified Resource API (https://api.crossref.org/swagger-ui/index.html), to.science.api (https://frl.publisso.de/), ZDB JSON-API (beta) (https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/api/), lobid - Dateninfrastruktur für Bibliotheken (https://lobid.org/resources/search)
1000 Label
1000 Dateien
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6449194.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2023-05-04T11:33:39.424+0200
1000 Erstellt von 322
1000 beschreibt frl:6449194
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2023-10-21T00:37:07.699+0200
1000 Objekt bearb. Sat Oct 21 00:37:07 CEST 2023
1000 Vgl. frl:6449194
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6449194 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source