Download
Heise-et-al_2022_CAT HPPR.pdf 1,22MB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • CAT HPPR: a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of systematic, rapid, and scoping reviews investigating interventions in health promotion and prevention
1000 Autor/in
  1. Heise, Thomas |
  2. Seidler, Andreas |
  3. Girbig, Maria |
  4. Freiberg, Alice |
  5. Alayli, Adrienne |
  6. Fischer, Maria |
  7. Haß, Wolfgang |
  8. Zeeb, Hajo |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2022
1000 LeibnizOpen
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2022-12-06
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 22(1):334
1000 FRL-Sammlung
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2022
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01821-4 |
  • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791771/ |
1000 Ergänzendes Material
  • https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-022-01821-4#Sec17 |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Begutachtungsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • BACKGROUND: For over three decades researchers have developed critical appraisal tools (CATs) for assessing the scientific quality of research overviews. Most established CATs for reviews in evidence-based medicine and evidence-based public health (EBPH) focus on systematic reviews (SRs) with studies on experimental interventions or exposure included. EBPH- and implementation-oriented organisations and decision-makers, however, often seek access to rapid reviews (RRs) or scoping reviews (ScRs) for rapid evidence synthesis and research field exploration. Until now, no CAT is available to assess the quality of SRs, RRs, and ScRs following a unified approach. We set out to develop such a CAT. METHODS: The development process of the Critical Appraisal Tool for Health Promotion and Prevention Reviews (CAT HPPR) included six phases: (i) the definition of important review formats and complementary approaches, (ii) the identification of relevant CATs, (iii) prioritisation, selection and adaptation of quality criteria using a consensus approach, (iv) development of the rating system and bilingual guidance documents, (v) engaging with experts in the field for piloting/optimising the CAT, and (vi) approval of the final CAT. We used a pragmatic search approach to identify reporting guidelines/standards (n = 3; e.g. PRISMA, MECIR) as well as guidance documents (n = 17; e.g. for reviews with mixed-methods approach) to develop working definitions for SRs, RRs, ScRs, and other review types (esp. those defined by statistical methods or included data sources). RESULTS: We successfully identified 14 relevant CATs, predominantly for SRs (e.g. AMSTAR 2), and extracted 46 items. Following consensual discussions 15 individual criteria were included in our CAT and tailored to the review types of interest. The CAT was piloted with 14 different reviews which were eligible to be included in a new German database looking at interventions in health promotion and prevention in different implementation settings. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed CAT HPPR follows a unique uniformed approach to assess a set of heterogeneous reviews (e.g. reviews from problem identification to policy evaluations) to assist end-users needs. Feedback of external experts showed general feasibility and satisfaction with the tool. Future studies should further formally test the validity of CAT HPPR using larger sets of reviews.
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Critical appraisal tool
lokal Health promotion
lokal Scoping review
lokal Mixed-methods
lokal Systematic review
lokal Prevention
lokal Meta-analysis
lokal Review of reviews
lokal Rapid review
lokal Evidence synthesis
1000 Fächerklassifikation (DDC)
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0482-7657|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/U2VpZGxlciwgQW5kcmVhcw==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/R2lyYmlnLCBNYXJpYQ==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/RnJlaWJlcmcsIEFsaWNl|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/QWxheWxpLCBBZHJpZW5uZQ==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/RmlzY2hlciwgTWFyaWE=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/SGHDnywgV29sZmdhbmc=|https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7509-242X
1000 Label
1000 Förderer
  1. Projekt DEAL |
  2. GKV-Bündnis für Gesundheit |
1000 Fördernummer
  1. -
  2. -
1000 Förderprogramm
  1. Open Access funding
  2. -
1000 Dateien
1000 Förderung
  1. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer Projekt DEAL |
    1000 Förderprogramm Open Access funding
    1000 Fördernummer -
  2. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer GKV-Bündnis für Gesundheit |
    1000 Förderprogramm -
    1000 Fördernummer -
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6452690.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2023-05-30T13:19:42.154+0200
1000 Erstellt von 266
1000 beschreibt frl:6452690
1000 Bearbeitet von 317
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2023-05-30T14:14:53.852+0200
1000 Objekt bearb. Tue May 30 14:13:33 CEST 2023
1000 Vgl. frl:6452690
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6452690 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source