Download
s12885-021-08578-x.pdf 1,04MB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • eCross-cultural adaptation of the spine oncology-specific SOSGOQ2.0 questionnaire to German language and the assessment of its validity and reliability in the clinical setting
1000 Autor/in
  1. Datzmann, T. |
  2. Kisel, W. |
  3. Kramer, J. |
  4. Schmitt, J. |
  5. Schaser, K. D. |
  6. Disch, A. C. |
  7. Dreimann, M. |
  8. Müller-Broich, J. D. |
  9. Netzer, C. |
  10. Sauer, D. |
  11. Heyde, C. |
  12. Schmidt, R. |
  13. Kreinest, M. |
  14. Arand, M. |
  15. Liljenqvist, U. |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2021
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2021-09-23
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 21(1):1044
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2021
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08578-x |
  • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8459467/ |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • Background!#!The recently developed Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ2.0) was proven a valid and reliable instrument measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for patients with spinal malignancies. A German version was not available.!##!Objective!#!A cross-cultural adaptation of the SOSGOQ2.0 to the German language and its multicenter evaluation.!##!Methods!#!In a multistep process, a cross-cultural adaptation of the SOSGOQ2.0 was conducted. Subsequently, a multicenter, prospective observational cohort study was initiated to assess the reliability and validity of the German adaptation. To assess external construct validity of the cross-cultural adapted questionnaire, a comparison to the established questionnaire QLQ-C30 from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer was conducted. Mean-difference plots were used to measure the agreement between the questionnaires in total score and by domain (deviation from mean up to 10% allowed). Further reliability and validity tests were carried out. Change to baseline was analysed 3-16 weeks later after different interventions occurred. Clinically relevant thresholds in comparison to the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire were evaluated by ROC curve analysis.!##!Results!#!We could enroll 113 patients from four different university hospitals (58 females, 55 males). Mean age was 64.11 years (sd 11.9). 80 patients had an ECOG performance status of 2 or higher at baseline. External construct validity in comparison to the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire in total score and by domain was confirmed (range of deviation 4.4 to 9.0%). Good responsiveness for the domains Physical Functioning (P < .001) and Pain (P < .001) could be shown. The group mean values also displayed a difference in the domains of Social Functioning (P = .331) and Mental Health (P = .130), but not significant. The minimum clinically relevant threshold values for the questionnaire ranged from 4.0 to 7.5 points.!##!Conclusions!#!According to our results, the cross-cultural adapted questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool to measure HRQOL in German speaking patients with spinal malignancies. Especially the domains Physical Functioning and Pain showed overall good psychometric characteristics. In this way, a generic questionnaire, such as the EORTC QLQ-C30, can be usefully supplemented by spine-specific questions to increase the overall accuracy measuring HRQOL in patients with spinal malignancies.
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Health Surveys/instrumentation [MeSH]
lokal Surveys and Questionnaires [MeSH]
lokal Female [MeSH]
lokal Health Status [MeSH]
lokal Measurement comparison
lokal Health-related quality of life
lokal Cancer
lokal Aged [MeSH]
lokal Spinal malignancies
lokal Adult [MeSH]
lokal Language [MeSH]
lokal Humans [MeSH]
lokal Spinal Neoplasms/secondary [MeSH]
lokal Prospective Studies [MeSH]
lokal Middle Aged [MeSH]
lokal Male [MeSH]
lokal Reproducibility of Results [MeSH]
lokal Acculturation [MeSH]
lokal Quality of Life [MeSH]
lokal ROC Curve [MeSH]
lokal Research
lokal Germany [MeSH]
lokal Translations [MeSH]
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/RGF0em1hbm4sIFQu|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/S2lzZWwsIFcu|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/S3JhbWVyLCBKLg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/U2NobWl0dCwgSi4=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/U2NoYXNlciwgSy4gRC4=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/RGlzY2gsIEEuIEMu|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/RHJlaW1hbm4sIE0u|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/TcO8bGxlci1Ccm9pY2gsIEouIEQu|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/TmV0emVyLCBDLg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/U2F1ZXIsIEQu|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/SGV5ZGUsIEMu|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/U2NobWlkdCwgUi4=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/S3JlaW5lc3QsIE0u|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/QXJhbmQsIE0u|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/TGlsamVucXZpc3QsIFUu
1000 Hinweis
  • DeepGreen-ID: a2ed822d71e848bb88859abe6d989127 ; metadata provieded by: DeepGreen (https://www.oa-deepgreen.de/api/v1/), LIVIVO search scope life sciences (http://z3950.zbmed.de:6210/livivo), Crossref Unified Resource API (https://api.crossref.org/swagger-ui/index.html), to.science.api (https://frl.publisso.de/), ZDB JSON-API (beta) (https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/api/), lobid - Dateninfrastruktur für Bibliotheken (https://lobid.org/resources/search)
1000 Label
1000 Dateien
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6463169.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2023-11-15T16:59:37.208+0100
1000 Erstellt von 322
1000 beschreibt frl:6463169
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2023-11-30T21:09:46.167+0100
1000 Objekt bearb. Thu Nov 30 21:09:46 CET 2023
1000 Vgl. frl:6463169
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6463169 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source