Download
s00423-020-01903-1.pdf 310,28KB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Randomised-controlled feasibility trial on abdominal wall closure techniques in patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001)
1000 Autor/in
  1. Probst, Pascal |
  2. Tran, Dinh Thien-An |
  3. Hüttner, Felix J. |
  4. Harnoss, Julian C. |
  5. Heger, Patrick |
  6. Ritter, Alina S. |
  7. Doerr-Harim, Colette |
  8. Mihaljevic, André L. |
  9. Knebel, Phillip |
  10. Schneider, Martin |
  11. Büchler, Markus W. |
  12. Diener, Markus K. |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2020
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2020-06-06
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 405(4):427-434
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2020
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01903-1 |
  • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359135/ |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • Background!#!Patients undergoing relaparotomy are generally underrepresented in clinical trials, despite how common the procedure is in clinical practice. Specifically, techniques for re-do abdominal wall closure have never been evaluated in a randomised-controlled trial. The aim of this trial was to identify the optimal abdominal wall closure technique in patients undergoing relaparotomy.!##!Methods!#!In this monocentric, randomised feasibility trial, patients scheduled for elective relaparotomy were randomised to abdominal wall closure with either the small stitches technique, using Monomax® 2-0, or the large stitches technique, using PDS II® 1 loop. Patients' postoperative courses were followed for 1 year after the index operation. Effectiveness and safety outcomes were compared at a level of significance of 5% between the two techniques.!##!Results!#!A total of 100 out of 131 patients (76.3%) were evenly randomised to the small stitches and large stitches groups. The time for abdominal wall closure did not differ between the two techniques (small stitches 27.5 ± 9.5 min versus large stitches 25.3 ± 12.4 min; p = 0.334). The overall comprehensive complication index was 14.4 ± 15.5 in the small stitches group and 19.9 ± 23.4 in the large stitches group (p = 0.168). Specifically, rates of surgical site infection (small stitches 30.0% versus large stitches 36.0%; p = 0.524) and burst abdomen (small stitches 4.0% versus large stitches 0.0%; p = 0.495) did not differ. After 1 year, incisional hernia rate was 7.5% in the small stitches group and 10.0% in the large stitches group (p > 0.999).!##!Discussion!#!Both abdominal wall closure techniques investigated in this trial were feasible in relaparotomy patients. This exploratory trial revealed no noticeable difference in the effectiveness or safety of the small stitches technique with Monomax® 2-0 versus the large stitches technique with PDS II® 1 loop. Therefore, surgeons should stay with their preferred suture technique in relaparotomy patients.!##!Trial registration!#!Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien ( www.germanctr.de ): DRKS00013001.
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Female [MeSH]
lokal Aged [MeSH]
lokal Humans [MeSH]
lokal Sutures [MeSH]
lokal Treatment Outcome [MeSH]
lokal Postoperative Complications/epidemiology [MeSH]
lokal Middle Aged [MeSH]
lokal Abdominal surgery
lokal Reoperation/adverse effects [MeSH]
lokal Abdominal wall
lokal Feasibility Studies [MeSH]
lokal Suture Techniques/adverse effects [MeSH]
lokal Controlled Clinical Trials
lokal Male [MeSH]
lokal Relaparotomy
lokal Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques/adverse effects [MeSH]
lokal Fascial closure
lokal Laparotomy/adverse effects [MeSH]
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0895-4015|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/VHJhbiwgRGluaCBUaGllbi1Bbg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/SMO8dHRuZXIsIEZlbGl4IEou|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/SGFybm9zcywgSnVsaWFuIEMu|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/SGVnZXIsIFBhdHJpY2s=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/Uml0dGVyLCBBbGluYSBTLg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/RG9lcnItSGFyaW0sIENvbGV0dGU=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/TWloYWxqZXZpYywgQW5kcsOpIEwu|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/S25lYmVsLCBQaGlsbGlw|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/U2NobmVpZGVyLCBNYXJ0aW4=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/QsO8Y2hsZXIsIE1hcmt1cyBXLg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/RGllbmVyLCBNYXJrdXMgSy4=
1000 Hinweis
  • DeepGreen-ID: 42ef94d020d14e0b8083054dbf9941ff ; metadata provieded by: DeepGreen (https://www.oa-deepgreen.de/api/v1/), LIVIVO search scope life sciences (http://z3950.zbmed.de:6210/livivo), Crossref Unified Resource API (https://api.crossref.org/swagger-ui/index.html), to.science.api (https://frl.publisso.de/), ZDB JSON-API (beta) (https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/api/), lobid - Dateninfrastruktur für Bibliotheken (https://lobid.org/resources/search)
1000 Label
1000 Dateien
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6467666.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2023-11-17T11:33:24.271+0100
1000 Erstellt von 322
1000 beschreibt frl:6467666
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet Fri Dec 01 06:35:58 CET 2023
1000 Objekt bearb. Fri Dec 01 06:35:58 CET 2023
1000 Vgl. frl:6467666
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6467666 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source