Download
s00520-020-05370-8.pdf 615,61KB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for advanced cancer pain inpatients in specialist palliative care—a blinded, randomized, sham-controlled pilot cross-over trial
1000 Autor/in
  1. Siemens, Waldemar |
  2. Boehlke, Christopher |
  3. Bennett, Michael |
  4. Offner, Klaus |
  5. Becker, Gerhild |
  6. Gaertner, Jan |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2020
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2020-03-03
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 28(11):5323-5333
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2020
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05370-8 |
  • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547037/ |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • Purpose!#!Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a treatment option for cancer pain, but the evidence is inconclusive. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TENS.!##!Methods!#!A blinded, randomized, sham-controlled pilot cross-over trial (NCT02655289) was conducted on an inpatient specialist palliative care ward. We included adult inpatients with cancer pain ≥ 3 on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). Intensity-modulated high TENS (IMT) was compared with placebo TENS (PBT). Patients used both modes according to their preferred application scheme during 24 h with a 24-h washout phase. The primary outcome was change in average pain intensity on the NRS during the preceding 24 h. Responders were patients with at least a 'slight improvement.'!##!Results!#!Of 632 patients screened, 25 were randomized (sequence IMT-PBT = 13 and PBT-IMT = 12). Finally, 11 patients in IMT-PBT and 9 in PBT-IMT completed the study (N = 20). The primary outcome did not differ between groups (IMT minus PBT: - 0.2, 95% confidence interval - 0.9 to 0.6). However, responder rates were higher in IMT (17/20 [85%] vs. 10/20 [50%], p = 0.0428). Two patients experienced an uncomfortable feeling caused by the current, one after IMT and one after PBT. Seven patients (35%) desired a TENS prescription. Women and patients with incident pain were most likely to benefit from TENS.!##!Conclusion!#!TENS was safe, but IMT was unlikely to offer more analgesic effects than PBT. Even though many patients desired a TENS prescription, 50% still reported at least 'slight pain relief' from PBT. Differences for gender and incident pain aspects demand future trials.
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Disease Progression [MeSH]
lokal Placebos [MeSH]
lokal Aged [MeSH]
lokal Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation/methods [MeSH]
lokal Pain Management/standards [MeSH]
lokal Palliative care
lokal Original Article
lokal Palliative Care/methods [MeSH]
lokal Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
lokal Male [MeSH]
lokal Neoplasms/pathology [MeSH]
lokal Palliative Care/standards [MeSH]
lokal Neoplasms/therapy [MeSH]
lokal Cancer Pain/therapy [MeSH]
lokal Complementary therapies
lokal Inpatients [MeSH]
lokal Pain Management/methods [MeSH]
lokal Female [MeSH]
lokal Adult [MeSH]
lokal Humans [MeSH]
lokal Treatment Outcome [MeSH]
lokal Middle Aged [MeSH]
lokal Non-pharmacological
lokal Cancer pain
lokal Pain Measurement [MeSH]
lokal Cross-Over Studies [MeSH]
lokal Germany [MeSH]
lokal Pilot Projects [MeSH]
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4238-5327|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6985-0201|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2022-1105|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/T2ZmbmVyLCBLbGF1cw==|https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9060-0285|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1176-3164
1000 Hinweis
  • DeepGreen-ID: 5e501ca4696d438a81e15912ec2770f1 ; metadata provieded by: DeepGreen (https://www.oa-deepgreen.de/api/v1/), LIVIVO search scope life sciences (http://z3950.zbmed.de:6210/livivo), Crossref Unified Resource API (https://api.crossref.org/swagger-ui/index.html), to.science.api (https://frl.publisso.de/), ZDB JSON-API (beta) (https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/api/), lobid - Dateninfrastruktur für Bibliotheken (https://lobid.org/resources/search)
1000 Label
1000 Dateien
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6467814.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2023-11-17T12:28:22.393+0100
1000 Erstellt von 322
1000 beschreibt frl:6467814
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet Fri Dec 01 06:51:44 CET 2023
1000 Objekt bearb. Fri Dec 01 06:51:44 CET 2023
1000 Vgl. frl:6467814
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6467814 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source