Download
s10353-020-00677-6.pdf 326,71KB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Complete mesocolic excision in minimally invasive surgery of colonic cancer: do we need the robot?
1000 Autor/in
  1. Wilhelm, Dirk |
  2. Vogel, Thomas |
  3. Neumann, Philipp-Alexander |
  4. Friess, Helmut |
  5. Kranzfelder, Michael |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2020
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2020-11-13
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 53(4):166-174
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2020
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-020-00677-6 |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • <jats:title>Summary</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>Robotic surgery offers favorable prerequisites for complex minimally invasive surgeries which are delivered by higher degrees of freedom, improved instrument stability, and a perfect visualization in 3D which is fully surgeon controlled. In this article we aim to assess its impact on complete mesocolic excision (CME) in colon cancer and to answer the question of whether the current evidence expresses a need for robotic surgery for this indication.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>Retrospective analysis and review of the current literature on complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer comparing the outcome after open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Complete mesocolic excision results in improved disease-free survival and reduced local recurrence, but turns out to be complex and prone to complications. Introduced in open surgery, the transfer to minimally invasive surgery resulted in comparable results, however, with high conversion rates. In comparison, robotic surgery shows a reduced conversion rate and a tendency toward higher lymph node yield. Data, however, are insufficient and no high-quality studies have been published to date. Almost no oncologic follow-up data are available in the literature.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>The current data do not allow for a reliable conclusion on the need of robotic surgery for CME, but show results which hypothesize an equivalence if not superiority to laparoscopy. Due to recently published technical improvements for robotic CME and supplementary features of this method, we suppose that this approach will gain in importance in the future.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Technology
lokal Laparoscopy
lokal Conversion
lokal Main Topic
lokal Robotic surgery
lokal Lymph node yield
lokal Suprapubic approach
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2972-9802|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/Vm9nZWwsIFRob21hcw==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/TmV1bWFubiwgUGhpbGlwcC1BbGV4YW5kZXI=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/RnJpZXNzLCBIZWxtdXQ=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/S3JhbnpmZWxkZXIsIE1pY2hhZWw=
1000 Hinweis
  • DeepGreen-ID: 3f7f68f622604fa1a4e60270fd2848bb ; metadata provieded by: DeepGreen (https://www.oa-deepgreen.de/api/v1/), LIVIVO search scope life sciences (http://z3950.zbmed.de:6210/livivo), Crossref Unified Resource API (https://api.crossref.org/swagger-ui/index.html), to.science.api (https://frl.publisso.de/), ZDB JSON-API (beta) (https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/api/), lobid - Dateninfrastruktur für Bibliotheken (https://lobid.org/resources/search)
1000 Label
1000 Dateien
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6468364.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2023-11-17T15:55:54.125+0100
1000 Erstellt von 322
1000 beschreibt frl:6468364
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2023-12-01T07:46:46.352+0100
1000 Objekt bearb. Fri Dec 01 07:46:46 CET 2023
1000 Vgl. frl:6468364
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6468364 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source