Download
s00464-019-07361-1.pdf 3,76MB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Functional outcomes after laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
1000 Autor/in
  1. Kowalewski, K. F. |
  2. Seifert, L. |
  3. Ali, S. |
  4. Schmidt, M. W. |
  5. Seide, S. |
  6. Haney, C. |
  7. Tapking, C. |
  8. Shamiyeh, A. |
  9. Kulu, Y. |
  10. Hackert, T. |
  11. Müller-Stich, B. P. |
  12. Nickel, Felix |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2020
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2020-02-05
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 35(1):81-95
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2020
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07361-1 |
  • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746565/ |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • Surgical resection is crucial for curative treatment of rectal cancer. Through multidisciplinary treatment, including radiochemotherapy and total mesorectal excision, survival has improved substantially. Consequently, more patients have to deal with side effects of treatment. The most recently introduced surgical technique is robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) which seems equally effective in terms of oncological control compared to laparoscopy. However, RAS enables further advantages which maximize the precision of surgery, thus providing better functional outcomes such as sexual function or contience without compromising oncological results. This review was done according to the PRISMA and AMSTAR-II guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018104519). The search was planned with PICO criteria and conducted on Medline, Web of Science and CENTRAL. All screening steps were performed by two independent reviewers. Inclusion criteria were original, comparative studies for laparoscopy vs. RAS for rectal cancer and reporting of functional outcomes. Quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The search retrieved 9703 hits, of which 51 studies with 24,319 patients were included. There was a lower rate of urinary retention (non-RCTs: Odds ratio (OR) [95% Confidence Interval (CI)] 0.65 [0.46, 0.92]; RCTs: OR[CI] 1.29[0.08, 21.47]), ileus (non-RCTs: OR[CI] 0.86[0.75, 0.98]; RCTs: OR[CI] 0.80[0.33, 1.93]), less urinary symptoms (non-RCTs mean difference (MD) [CI] - 0.60 [- 1.17, - 0.03]; RCTs: - 1.37 [- 4.18, 1.44]), and higher quality of life for RAS (only non-RCTs: MD[CI]: 2.99 [2.02, 3.95]). No significant differences were found for sexual function (non-RCTs: standardized MD[CI]: 0.46[- 0.13, 1.04]; RCTs: SMD[CI]: 0.09[- 0.14, 0.31]). The current meta-analysis suggests potential benefits for RAS over laparoscopy in terms of functional outcomes after rectal cancer resection. The current evidence is limited due to non-randomized controlled trials and reporting of functional outcomes as secondary endpoints.
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Aged, 80 and over [MeSH]
lokal Aged [MeSH]
lokal Meta-analysis
lokal Proctectomy/methods [MeSH]
lokal Robotic-assisted surgery
lokal Databases, Factual [MeSH]
lokal Proctectomy/adverse effects [MeSH]
lokal Male [MeSH]
lokal Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects [MeSH]
lokal Quality of Life [MeSH]
lokal Functional outcomes
lokal Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods [MeSH]
lokal Evidence-based medicine
lokal Female [MeSH]
lokal Laparoscopy/methods [MeSH]
lokal Minimally invasive surgery
lokal Postoperative Complications [MeSH]
lokal Laparoscopy/adverse effects [MeSH]
lokal Rectum/surgery [MeSH]
lokal Adult [MeSH]
lokal Humans [MeSH]
lokal Treatment Outcome [MeSH]
lokal Middle Aged [MeSH]
lokal Rectal Neoplasms/surgery [MeSH]
lokal Article
lokal Odds Ratio [MeSH]
lokal Laparoscopy
lokal Rectal cancer
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/S293YWxld3NraSwgSy4gRi4=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/U2VpZmVydCwgTC4=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/QWxpLCBTLg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/U2NobWlkdCwgTS4gVy4=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/U2VpZGUsIFMu|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/SGFuZXksIEMu|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/VGFwa2luZywgQy4=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/U2hhbWl5ZWgsIEEu|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/S3VsdSwgWS4=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/SGFja2VydCwgVC4=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/TcO8bGxlci1TdGljaCwgQi4gUC4=|https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6066-8238
1000 Hinweis
  • DeepGreen-ID: faa25afdce4e46afb4ec480ed860e4d9 ; metadata provieded by: DeepGreen (https://www.oa-deepgreen.de/api/v1/), LIVIVO search scope life sciences (http://z3950.zbmed.de:6210/livivo), Crossref Unified Resource API (https://api.crossref.org/swagger-ui/index.html), to.science.api (https://frl.publisso.de/), ZDB JSON-API (beta) (https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/api/), lobid - Dateninfrastruktur für Bibliotheken (https://lobid.org/resources/search)
1000 Label
1000 Dateien
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6469496.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2023-11-17T23:18:19.741+0100
1000 Erstellt von 322
1000 beschreibt frl:6469496
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2023-12-01T09:57:20.412+0100
1000 Objekt bearb. Fri Dec 01 09:57:20 CET 2023
1000 Vgl. frl:6469496
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6469496 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source