Download
s40520-020-01703-z.pdf 602,21KB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • The effect of different test protocols and walking distances on gait speed in older persons
1000 Autor/in
  1. Krumpoch, Sebastian |
  2. Lindemann, Ulrich |
  3. Rappl, Anja |
  4. Becker, Clemens |
  5. Sieber, Cornel C. |
  6. Freiberger, Ellen |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2020
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2020-09-15
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 33(1):141-146
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2020
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-020-01703-z |
  • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7897617/ |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • Background and aims!#!Walking is the core physical activity of older persons. The assessment of walking capacity is increasingly important for clinical purposes and clinical research. Differences between assessment tools and protocols for short walks to obtain gait characteristics can be responsible for changes, e.g., in gait speed from 0.1 to 0.2 m/s. The purpose of this study was to generate further knowledge for the harmonization and/or standardization of short walk-test protocols for assessing gait characteristics under supervised conditions.!##!Methods!#!For this cross-sectional study, 150 community-dwelling older adults (mean age 80.5 ± 4.5 years) were recruited. Participants performed eight walks differing in the distance (8-versus 4-m), static versus dynamic trials and comparing different test speed instructions (usual versus maximal) on an electronic walkway.!##!Results!#!A meaningful significant difference in mean usual gait speed was documented comparing the 4-m dynamic and static test protocol (0.12 m/s; p = 0.001). For the same comparison over an 8-m distance (dynamic versus static) and for the comparison between usual gait speed over 4-and 8-m, the differences in gait speed were smaller, but still statistically significant (p = 0.001).!##!Conclusions!#!Gait speed was faster, if the test protocol did not include a static start or stop. The differences were greater for a shorter walking distance. This aspect should be considered for the comparison of study results and is particularly relevant for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Gait speed
lokal Aged, 80 and over [MeSH]
lokal Aged [MeSH]
lokal Humans [MeSH]
lokal Test protocol
lokal Deceleration phase
lokal Cross-Sectional Studies [MeSH]
lokal Walk Test [MeSH]
lokal Original Article
lokal Gait [MeSH]
lokal Walking Speed [MeSH]
lokal Acceleration phase
lokal Walking [MeSH]
lokal Aged
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/S3J1bXBvY2gsIFNlYmFzdGlhbg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/TGluZGVtYW5uLCBVbHJpY2g=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/UmFwcGwsIEFuamE=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/QmVja2VyLCBDbGVtZW5z|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/U2llYmVyLCBDb3JuZWwgQy4=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/RnJlaWJlcmdlciwgRWxsZW4=
1000 Hinweis
  • DeepGreen-ID: 7733bc1d547e4c90b3c5c986c490107d ; metadata provieded by: DeepGreen (https://www.oa-deepgreen.de/api/v1/), LIVIVO search scope life sciences (http://z3950.zbmed.de:6210/livivo), Crossref Unified Resource API (https://api.crossref.org/swagger-ui/index.html), to.science.api (https://frl.publisso.de/), ZDB JSON-API (beta) (https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/api/), lobid - Dateninfrastruktur für Bibliotheken (https://lobid.org/resources/search)
1000 Label
1000 Dateien
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6472201.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2023-11-18T18:47:20.531+0100
1000 Erstellt von 322
1000 beschreibt frl:6472201
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet Fri Apr 05 10:52:23 CEST 2024
1000 Objekt bearb. Fri Apr 05 10:52:23 CEST 2024
1000 Vgl. frl:6472201
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6472201 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source