Download
2512-8442_a000134.pdf 773,53KB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • How Communicating Vaccine Benefits and Harms in Fact Boxes AffectsRisk Perceptions
1000 Autor/in
  1. Felgendreff, Lisa |
  2. Renkewitz, Frank |
  3. Betsch, Cornelia |
1000 Verlag
  • Hogrefe Publishing
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2023
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2023-07-20
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 30(4):169-179
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2023
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1027/2512-8442/a000134 |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Begutachtungsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • <jats:p> Abstract: Background: A fact box is a promising tool for benefit-risk communication. This compact table summarizes the benefits and harms of a health-related intervention and compares the intervention to a control group. Although previous research has demonstrated that fact boxes are well understood, little is known about how they affect risk perceptions. Risk perception is particularly relevant to vaccination behavior. Aims: Two experiments investigated how different profiles of vaccine benefits and harms influence risk perceptions and the intention to vaccinate. Method: In Experiment 1, 430 participants were included in a 4 (benefits [vaccine effectiveness]) × 2 (harms [probability of vaccine adverse events]) between-subjects design. In Experiment 2, 541 participants were included in a 2 (benefits) × 2 (harms) × 2 (comprehension test conducted before or after assessment of risk perceptions) between-subjects design. Measures: Perceived risk of vaccination, intention to vaccinate, comprehension, and, in Experiment 2 only, perceived risk of non-vaccination. Results: Greater benefits decreased the perceived risk of vaccination and increased the intention to vaccinate. More harms increased the perceived risk of vaccination and, in Experiment 2 only, decreased the intention to vaccinate. More benefits increased the perceived risk of non-vaccination. Exploratory analyses showed that the comprehension and position of a comprehension test influenced risk perceptions. Limitations: The experiments used MTurk convenience samples and a fictitious disease. Conclusion: Communicating vaccine profiles in fact boxes affects risk perceptions. Additional measures may cue a deeper elaboration of the vaccine profile. </jats:p>
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Original Article
lokal risk communication
lokal preventive health behavior
lokal decision-making
lokal vaccination
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8356-8061|https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8072-6802|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2856-7303
1000 Hinweis
  • DeepGreen-ID: 873dd8dec8614079b4056a700c169ec0 ; metadata provieded by: DeepGreen (https://www.oa-deepgreen.de/api/v1/), LIVIVO search scope life sciences (http://z3950.zbmed.de:6210/livivo), Crossref Unified Resource API (https://api.crossref.org/swagger-ui/index.html), to.science.api (https://frl.publisso.de/), ZDB JSON-API (beta) (https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/api/), lobid - Dateninfrastruktur für Bibliotheken (https://lobid.org/resources/search)
1000 Label
1000 Dateien
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6479308.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2024-05-21T20:57:26.861+0200
1000 Erstellt von 322
1000 beschreibt frl:6479308
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2024-05-22T13:15:20.054+0200
1000 Objekt bearb. Wed May 22 13:15:20 CEST 2024
1000 Vgl. frl:6479308
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6479308 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source