Download
10.1177_19160216241278653.pdf 1,04MB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Tumor Bed Margins Versus Specimen Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: Too Close to Call?
1000 Autor/in
  1. Villemure-Poliquin, Noémie |
  2. Roy, Eve-Marie |
  3. Nguyen, Sally |
  4. Beauchemin, Michel |
  5. Audet, Nathalie |
1000 Verlag
  • SAGE Publications
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2024
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2024-09-09
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 53
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2024
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1177/19160216241278653 |
  • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384533/ |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Begutachtungsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • <jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p> The routine assessment of intraoperative margins has long been the standard of care for oral cavity cancers. However, there is a controversy surrounding the best method for sampling surgical margins. The aim of our study is to determine the precision of a new technique for sampling tumor bed margins (TBMs), to evaluate the impact on survival and the rate of free flap reconstructions. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p> This retrospective cohort study involved 156 patients with primary cancer of the tongue or floor of the mouth who underwent surgery as initial curative treatment. Patients were separated into 2 groups: one using an oriented TBM derived from Mohs’ technique, where the margins are taken from the tumor bed and identified with Vicryl sutures on both the specimen and the tumor bed, and the other using a specimen margins (SMs) driven technique, where the margins are taken from the specimen after the initial resection. Clinicopathologic features, including margin status, were compared for both groups and correlated with locoregional control. Precision of per-operative TBM sampling method was obtained. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> A total of 156 patients were included in the study, of which 80 were in TBM group and 76 were in SM group. Precision analysis showed that the oriented TBM technique pertained a 50% sensitivity, 96.6% specificity, 80% positive predictive value, and an 87.5% negative predictive value. Survival analysis revealed nonstatistically significant differences in both local control (86.88% vs 83.50%; P = .81) as well as local-regional control (82.57% vs 72.32%; P = .21). There was a significant difference in the rate of free flap-surgeries between the 2 groups (30% vs 64.5%; P &lt; .001). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p> Our described oriented TBM technique has demonstrated reduced risk of free flap reconstructive surgery, increased precision, and similar prognostic in terms of local control, locoregional control, and disease-free survival when compared to the SM method. </jats:p></jats:sec>
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality [MeSH]
lokal Female [MeSH]
lokal Mouth Neoplasms/pathology [MeSH]
lokal Aged, 80 and over [MeSH]
lokal Aged [MeSH]
lokal Adult [MeSH]
lokal Free Tissue Flaps [MeSH]
lokal Humans [MeSH]
lokal Margins of Excision [MeSH]
lokal Retrospective Studies [MeSH]
lokal Middle Aged [MeSH]
lokal locoregional recurrence
lokal oral cavity cancer
lokal Mohs Surgery [MeSH]
lokal Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods [MeSH]
lokal Mouth Neoplasms/surgery [MeSH]
lokal margin
lokal squamous cell carcinoma
lokal Male [MeSH]
lokal Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery [MeSH]
lokal Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology [MeSH]
lokal Original Research
lokal free flap surgery
lokal Mouth Neoplasms/mortality [MeSH]
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/VmlsbGVtdXJlLVBvbGlxdWluLCBOb8OpbWll|https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5571-3097|https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0421-9475|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/QmVhdWNoZW1pbiwgTWljaGVs|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9977-9493
1000 Hinweis
  • DeepGreen-ID: 816680488da64158b86191b948539176 ; metadata provieded by: DeepGreen (https://www.oa-deepgreen.de/api/v1/), LIVIVO search scope life sciences (http://z3950.zbmed.de:6210/livivo), Crossref Unified Resource API (https://api.crossref.org/swagger-ui/index.html), to.science.api (https://frl.publisso.de/), ZDB JSON-API (beta) (https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/api/), lobid - Dateninfrastruktur für Bibliotheken (https://lobid.org/resources/search)
1000 Label
1000 Dateien
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6485159.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2024-10-02T17:59:08.567+0200
1000 Erstellt von 322
1000 beschreibt frl:6485159
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2024-10-04T19:36:10.195+0200
1000 Objekt bearb. Fri Oct 04 19:36:10 CEST 2024
1000 Vgl. frl:6485159
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6485159 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source