Download
10488_2024_Article_1381.pdf 1,06MB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Using Progress Feedback to Enhance Treatment Outcomes: A Narrative Review
1000 Autor/in
  1. de Jong, Kim |
  2. Douglas, Susan |
  3. Wolpert, Miranda |
  4. Delgadillo, Jaime |
  5. Aas, Benjamin |
  6. Bovendeerd, Bram |
  7. Carlier, Ingrid |
  8. Compare, Angelo |
  9. Edbrooke-Childs, Julian |
  10. Janse, Pauline |
  11. Lutz, Wolfgang |
  12. Moltu, Christian |
  13. Nordberg, Samuel |
  14. Poulsen, Stig |
  15. Rubel, Julian A. |
  16. Schiepek, Günter |
  17. Schilling, Viola N. L. S. |
  18. van Sonsbeek, Maartje |
  19. Barkham, Michael |
1000 Verlag Springer US
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2024
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2024-05-11
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 52(1):210-222
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2024
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-024-01381-3 |
  • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703940/ |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Begutachtungsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>We face increasing demand for greater access to effective routine mental health services, including telehealth. However, treatment outcomes in routine clinical practice are only about half the size of those reported in controlled trials. Progress feedback, defined as the ongoing monitoring of patients’ treatment response with standardized measures, is an evidence-based practice that continues to be under-utilized in routine care. The aim of the current review is to provide a summary of the current evidence base for the use of progress feedback, its mechanisms of action and considerations for successful implementation. We reviewed ten available meta-analyses, which report small to medium overall effect sizes. The results suggest that adding feedback to a wide range of psychological and psychiatric interventions (ranging from primary care to hospitalization and crisis care) tends to enhance the effectiveness of these interventions. The strongest evidence is for patients with common mental health problems compared to those with very severe disorders. Effect sizes for not-on-track cases, a subgroup of cases that are not progressing well, are found to be somewhat stronger, especially when clinical support tools are added to the feedback. Systematic reviews and recent studies suggest potential mechanisms of action for progress feedback include focusing the clinician’s attention, altering clinician expectations, providing new information, and enhancing patient-centered communication. Promising approaches to strengthen progress feedback interventions include advanced systems with signaling technology, clinical problem-solving tools, and a broader spectrum of outcome and progress measures. An overview of methodological and implementation challenges is provided, as well as suggestions for addressing these issues in future studies. We conclude that while feedback has modest effects, it is a small and affordable intervention that can potentially improve outcomes in psychological interventions. Further research into mechanisms of action and effective implementation strategies is needed.</jats:p>
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Original Article
lokal Progress feedback
lokal Measurement-based care
lokal Routine outcome monitoring
1000 Fächerklassifikation (DDC)
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7621-9290|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/RG91Z2xhcywgU3VzYW4=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/V29scGVydCwgTWlyYW5kYQ==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/RGVsZ2FkaWxsbywgSmFpbWU=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/QWFzLCBCZW5qYW1pbg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/Qm92ZW5kZWVyZCwgQnJhbQ==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/Q2FybGllciwgSW5ncmlk|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/Q29tcGFyZSwgQW5nZWxv|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/RWRicm9va2UtQ2hpbGRzLCBKdWxpYW4=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/SmFuc2UsIFBhdWxpbmU=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/THV0eiwgV29sZmdhbmc=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/TW9sdHUsIENocmlzdGlhbg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/Tm9yZGJlcmcsIFNhbXVlbA==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/UG91bHNlbiwgU3RpZw==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/UnViZWwsIEp1bGlhbiBBLg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/U2NoaWVwZWssIEfDvG50ZXI=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/U2NoaWxsaW5nLCBWaW9sYSBOLiBMLiBTLg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/dmFuIFNvbnNiZWVrLCBNYWFydGpl|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/QmFya2hhbSwgTWljaGFlbA==
1000 Hinweis
  • DeepGreen-ID: f3b505a2d9c64c89b28f39a1490562f0 ; metadata provieded by: DeepGreen (https://www.oa-deepgreen.de/api/v1/), LIVIVO search scope life sciences (http://z3950.zbmed.de:6210/livivo), Crossref Unified Resource API (https://api.crossref.org/swagger-ui/index.html), to.science.api (https://frl.publisso.de/), ZDB JSON-API (beta) (https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/api/), lobid - Dateninfrastruktur für Bibliotheken (https://lobid.org/resources/search)
1000 Label
1000 Dateien
  1. Using Progress Feedback to Enhance Treatment Outcomes: A Narrative Review
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6494630.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2025-02-04T04:00:31.512+0100
1000 Erstellt von 322
1000 beschreibt frl:6494630
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2025-08-05T07:47:18.381+0200
1000 Objekt bearb. Tue Aug 05 07:47:18 CEST 2025
1000 Vgl. frl:6494630
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6494630 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source