Download
11136_2024_Article_3601.pdf 1,28MB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Scoring the EQ-HWB-S: can we do it without value sets? A non-parametric item response theory analysis
1000 Autor/in
  1. Feng, You-Shan |
  2. Kohlmann, Thomas |
  3. Peasgood, Tessa |
  4. Engel, Lidia |
  5. Mulhern, Brendan |
  6. Pickard, A. Simon |
1000 Verlag Springer International Publishing
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2024
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2024-02-21
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 33(5):1211-1222
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2024
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03601-7 |
  • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11045574/ |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Begutachtungsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>Only one pilot value set (UK) is currently available for the EQ Health and Wellbeing Instrument short version (EQ-HWB-S). As an alternative to preference-weighted scoring, we examined whether a level summary score (LSS) is appropriate for the EQ-HWB-S using Mokken scaling analyses.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>Data from patients, carers and the general population collected during the developmental phase of the EQ-HWB-S in Australia, US and UK were used, noting 3 of 9 items have since undergone revision. EQ-HWB-S data fit was examined using R package Mokken scaling’s monotone homogeneity model, utilizing the automated item selection procedure (AISP) as well as Loevinger’s scaling coefficients for items and the scale (H<jats:sub>S</jats:sub>). Manifest monotonicity was assessed by examining whether the cumulative probability for responses at or above each response level did not decrease across the summary score.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>EQ-HWB-S data were available for 3340 respondents: US = 903, Australia = 514 and UK = 1923. Mean age was 50 ± 18 and 1841 (55%) were female. AISP placed all 9 items of the EQ-HWB-S on a single scale when the lower bound was set to &lt; 0.448. Strong scalability (H<jats:sub>S</jats:sub> = 0.561) was found for the EQ-HWB-S as a single scale. Stronger scales were formed by separating the psychosocial items (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 6, H<jats:sub>S</jats:sub> = 0.683) and physical sensation items (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 3, H<jats:sub>S</jats:sub> = 0.713). No violations of monotonicity were found except for the items mobility and daily activities for the subgroups with long-term conditions and UK subjects, respectively.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Discussion</jats:title> <jats:p>As EQ-HWB-S items formed a strong scale and subscales based on Mokken analysis, LSS is a promising weighting-free approach to scoring.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Surveys and Questionnaires [MeSH]
lokal Female [MeSH]
lokal Australia [MeSH]
lokal Aged [MeSH]
lokal United States [MeSH]
lokal Adult [MeSH]
lokal Humans [MeSH]
lokal Middle Aged [MeSH]
lokal EQ-HWB-S
lokal Mokken scaling
lokal Psychometrics [MeSH]
lokal Article
lokal Unweighted summary score
lokal Male [MeSH]
lokal Non-parametric item response theory
lokal Quality of Life [MeSH]
lokal United Kingdom [MeSH]
lokal Non-preference scoring approaches
lokal Level sum score
1000 Fächerklassifikation (DDC)
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1509-3409|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/S29obG1hbm4sIFRob21hcw==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/UGVhc2dvb2QsIFRlc3Nh|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/RW5nZWwsIExpZGlh|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/TXVsaGVybiwgQnJlbmRhbg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/UGlja2FyZCwgQS4gU2ltb24=
1000 Hinweis
  • DeepGreen-ID: b888c5a7761d478c8737d3371eed4846 ; metadata provieded by: DeepGreen (https://www.oa-deepgreen.de/api/v1/), LIVIVO search scope life sciences (http://z3950.zbmed.de:6210/livivo), Crossref Unified Resource API (https://api.crossref.org/swagger-ui/index.html), to.science.api (https://frl.publisso.de/), ZDB JSON-API (beta) (https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/api/), lobid - Dateninfrastruktur für Bibliotheken (https://lobid.org/resources/search)
1000 Label
1000 Förderer
  1. EuroQol Research Foundation |
  2. Universitätsklinikum Tübingen |
1000 Fördernummer
  1. -
  2. -
1000 Förderprogramm
  1. -
  2. -
1000 Dateien
1000 Förderung
  1. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer EuroQol Research Foundation |
    1000 Förderprogramm -
    1000 Fördernummer -
  2. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer Universitätsklinikum Tübingen |
    1000 Förderprogramm -
    1000 Fördernummer -
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6498942.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2025-02-05T00:18:28.113+0100
1000 Erstellt von 322
1000 beschreibt frl:6498942
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2025-09-12T20:32:38.588+0200
1000 Objekt bearb. Fri Sep 12 20:32:38 CEST 2025
1000 Vgl. frl:6498942
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6498942 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source