Download
40271_2024_Article_679.pdf 927,88KB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Differences in Preferences for Drug Therapy Between Patients with Metastatic Versus Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review
1000 Autor/in
  1. Brandstetter, Lilly |
  2. Jírů-Hillmann, Steffi |
  3. Störk, Stefan |
  4. Heuschmann, Peter |
  5. Wöckel, Achim |
  6. Reese, Jens-Peter |
1000 Verlag
  • Springer International Publishing
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2024
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2024-03-07
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 17(4):349-362
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2024
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-024-00679-6 |
  • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11190003/ |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Begutachtungsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • Introduction!#!Compared with early stages (eBC) metastatic BC (mBC) is incurable. In mBC, aggressive treatment may increase the duration of survival but may also cause severe treatment side effects. A better understanding how patients with BC value different aspects of drug therapy might improve treatment effectiveness, satisfaction and adherence. This systematic review aims to identify and summarise studies evaluating patient preferences for drug therapy of BC and to compare preferences of patients with eBC and mBC.!##!Methods!#!The systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The electronic databases PubMed and Web of Science were searched on 22 June 2023. All studies published to this point were considered. Original studies reporting patient preferences on BC drug therapy determined by any type of choice experiment were eligible. A narrative synthesis of the effect measures presented as relative importance ratings, trade-offs (required benefit to make a therapy worthwhile) or monetary values of the treatment attributes was reported for each study. Risk of bias assessment for individual studies was performed using the checklist for observational studies from the STROBE Statement and the checklist from 'Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making: A User's Guide'. The study protocol was registered at the PROSPERO database (CRD42022377031).!##!Results!#!A total of 34 studies met the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis evaluating the preferences of patients with eBC (n = 18), mBC (n = 10) or any stage BC (n = 6) on, for example, chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, hormonal therapy or CKD4/6-inhibitors using different types of choice experiments. Regardless of the stage, most patients valued treatment effectiveness in terms of survival gains higher than potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Treatment cost, mode of administration, treatment regimen and monitoring aspects were considered as least important treatment attributes. In addition, preferences concerning 16 different types of ADRs were described, showing high heterogeneity within BC stages. Yet, comparable results across BC stages were observed.!##!Conclusions!#!Regardless of the stage, patients with BC consistently valued survival gains as the most important attribute and were willing to accept the risk of potential ADRs. Incorporating patient preferences in shared decision making may improve the effectiveness of interventions by enhancing adherence to drug therapy in patients suffering from BC.
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Neoplasm Staging [MeSH]
lokal Systematic Review
lokal Female [MeSH]
lokal Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects [MeSH]
lokal Patient Preference [MeSH]
lokal Humans [MeSH]
lokal Neoplasm Metastasis [MeSH]
lokal Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use [MeSH]
lokal Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy [MeSH]
lokal Breast Neoplasms/pathology [MeSH]
1000 Fächerklassifikation (DDC)
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0158-5402|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1275-5967|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1771-7249|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2681-3515|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6767-9666|https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3545-2552
1000 Hinweis
  • DeepGreen-ID: 79ccf23f4df84d909c7cb286d99eae7b ; metadata provieded by: DeepGreen (https://www.oa-deepgreen.de/api/v1/), LIVIVO search scope life sciences (http://z3950.zbmed.de:6210/livivo), Crossref Unified Resource API (https://api.crossref.org/swagger-ui/index.html), to.science.api (https://frl.publisso.de/), ZDB JSON-API (beta) (https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/api/), lobid - Dateninfrastruktur für Bibliotheken (https://lobid.org/resources/search)
1000 Label
1000 Förderer
  1. Bayerische Staatsministerium für Gesundheit und Pflege |
  2. Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg |
1000 Fördernummer
  1. -
  2. -
1000 Förderprogramm
  1. -
  2. -
1000 Dateien
1000 Förderung
  1. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer Bayerische Staatsministerium für Gesundheit und Pflege |
    1000 Förderprogramm -
    1000 Fördernummer -
  2. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg |
    1000 Förderprogramm -
    1000 Fördernummer -
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6506401.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2025-02-06T11:06:49.168+0100
1000 Erstellt von 322
1000 beschreibt frl:6506401
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2025-07-30T09:58:31.889+0200
1000 Objekt bearb. Wed Jul 30 09:58:31 CEST 2025
1000 Vgl. frl:6506401
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6506401 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source