Download
12903_2024_Article_4057.pdf 1,71MB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Performance of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in comparison to conventional computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of bone invasion in oral squamous cell cancer (OSCC): a prospective study
1000 Autor/in
  1. Straub, Anton |
  2. Linz, Christian |
  3. Lapa, Constantin |
  4. Hartmann, Stefan |
  5. Kübler, Alexander C. |
  6. Müller-Richter, Urs D. A. |
  7. Faber, Julian |
  8. Bley, Thorsten |
  9. Brumberg, Joachim |
  10. Kertels, Olivia |
  11. Brands, Roman C. |
1000 Verlag BioMed Central
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2024
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2024-03-16
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 24(1):341
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2024
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04057-4 |
  • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10944617/ |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Begutachtungsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>Oral squamous carcinoma (OSCC) is often diagnosed at late stages and bone erosion or invasion of the jawbone is frequently present. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are known to have high diagnostic sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies in detecting these bone affections in patients suffering from OSCC. To date, the existing data regarding the impact of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) have been weak. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether CBCT is a suitable tool to detect bone erosion or invasion in patients with OSCC.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>We investigated in a prospective trial the impact of CBCT in the diagnosis of bone erosion or invasion in patients with OSCC who underwent surgery. Every participant received a CBCT, CT, and MRI scan during staging. Imaging modalities were evaluated by two specialists in oral and maxillofacial surgery (CBCT) and two specialists in radiology (CT and MRI) in a blinded way, to determine whether a bone affection was present or not. Reporting used the following 3-point system: no bony destruction (“0”), cortical bone erosion (“1”), or medullary bone invasion (“2”). Histological examination or a follow-up served to calculate the sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies of the imaging modalities.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Our results revealed high diagnostic sensitivities (95.6%, 84.4%, and 88.9%), specificities (87.0%, 91.7%, and 91.7%), and accuracies (89.5%, 89.5%, and 90.8%) for CBCT, CT, and MRI. A pairwise comparison found no statistical difference between CBCT, CT, and MRI.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>Our data support the routine use of CBCT in the diagnosis of bone erosion and invasion in patients with OSCC as diagnostic accuracy is equal to CT and MRI, the procedure is cost-effective, and it can be performed during initial contact with the patient.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Mouth Neoplasms/pathology [MeSH]
lokal Computed tomography
lokal Bone invasion
lokal Spiral Cone-Beam Computed Tomography [MeSH]
lokal Humans [MeSH]
lokal Prospective Studies [MeSH]
lokal Bone resection
lokal Mouth Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging [MeSH]
lokal Mandibulectomy
lokal Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck [MeSH]
lokal Tomography, X-Ray Computed [MeSH]
lokal Oral squamous cell carcinoma
lokal Magnetic Resonance Imaging [MeSH]
lokal Cone-Beam Computed Tomography [MeSH]
lokal Epithelial Cells [MeSH]
lokal Head and neck cancer
lokal Research
lokal Head and Neck Neoplasms [MeSH]
lokal Magnetic resonance imaging
lokal Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology [MeSH]
lokal Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnostic imaging [MeSH]
lokal Oral cancer
lokal Cone-beam computed tomography
1000 Fächerklassifikation (DDC)
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/U3RyYXViLCBBbnRvbg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/TGlueiwgQ2hyaXN0aWFu|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/TGFwYSwgQ29uc3RhbnRpbg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/SGFydG1hbm4sIFN0ZWZhbg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/S8O8YmxlciwgQWxleGFuZGVyIEMu|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/TcO8bGxlci1SaWNodGVyLCBVcnMgRC4gQS4=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/RmFiZXIsIEp1bGlhbg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/QmxleSwgVGhvcnN0ZW4=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/QnJ1bWJlcmcsIEpvYWNoaW0=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/S2VydGVscywgT2xpdmlh|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/QnJhbmRzLCBSb21hbiBDLg==
1000 Hinweis
  • DeepGreen-ID: 48abe51e977d4893ba352b5840ecf46b ; metadata provieded by: DeepGreen (https://www.oa-deepgreen.de/api/v1/), LIVIVO search scope life sciences (http://z3950.zbmed.de:6210/livivo), Crossref Unified Resource API (https://api.crossref.org/swagger-ui/index.html), to.science.api (https://frl.publisso.de/), ZDB JSON-API (beta) (https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/api/), lobid - Dateninfrastruktur für Bibliotheken (https://lobid.org/resources/search)
1000 Label
1000 Förderer
  1. Universitätsklinikum Würzburg |
1000 Fördernummer
  1. -
1000 Förderprogramm
  1. -
1000 Dateien
1000 Förderung
  1. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer Universitätsklinikum Würzburg |
    1000 Förderprogramm -
    1000 Fördernummer -
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6518961.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2025-07-05T14:42:02.038+0200
1000 Erstellt von 322
1000 beschreibt frl:6518961
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2025-08-15T21:18:35.044+0200
1000 Objekt bearb. Fri Aug 15 21:18:35 CEST 2025
1000 Vgl. frl:6518961
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6518961 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source