Download
10029_2024_Article_3013.pdf 716,47KB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Mesh vs. non-mesh repair of type I hiatal hernias: a propensity-score matching analysis of 6533 patients from the Herniamed registry
1000 Autor/in
  1. Hoffmann, Henry |
  2. Glauser, P. |
  3. Adolf, D. |
  4. Kirchhoff, P. |
  5. Köckerling, F. |
1000 Verlag Springer Paris
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2024
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2024-03-29
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 28(5):1667-1678
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2024
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03013-z |
  • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450037/ |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Begutachtungsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Introduction</jats:title> <jats:p>Surgical treatment of type I hiatal sliding hernias aims to control the gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and prevention of hernia recurrence. Usually, a cruroplasty is performed to narrow the hiatal orifice. Here, it remains controversial if a mesh reinforcement of the cruroplasty should be performed, since benefits as well as mesh-associated complications have been described.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>We performed a propensity-score matching analysis with data derived from the Herniamed registry comparing patients undergoing laparoscopic type I hiatal hernia repair with and without synthetic mesh. We analyzed perioperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data including data derived from the 1-year follow-up in the registry.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>6.533 patients with an axial, type I hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal reflux are included in this analysis. Mesh augmentation of the hiatoplasty was performed in <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 1.252/6.533 (19.2%) of patients. The defect size in the subgroup of patients with mesh augmentation was with mean 16.3 cm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> [14.5; 18.2] significantly larger as in the subgroups without mesh augmentation with 10.8 cm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> [8.7; 12.9]; (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). In patients with mesh hiatoplasty <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 479 (38.3%) Nissen and <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 773 (61.7%) Toupet fundoplications are performed. 1.207 matched pairs could be analyzed. The mean defect size after matching was with 15.9 cm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> comparable in both groups. A significant association was seen regarding recurrence (4.72% mesh vs. 7.29% non-mesh hiatoplasty, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.012). The same relation can be seen for pain on exertion (8.78% vs 12.10%; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.014) and pain requiring treatment (6.13% vs 9.11%; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.010). All other outcome parameter showed no significant correlation.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>Our data demonstrate that mesh-reinforced laparoscopic type I hiatal hernia repair in larger defects is associated with significantly lower rates for recurrence, pain on exertion and pain requiring treatment.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Female [MeSH]
lokal Hernia, Hiatal/surgery [MeSH]
lokal Laparoscopy/methods [MeSH]
lokal Aged [MeSH]
lokal Humans [MeSH]
lokal Mesh
lokal GERD
lokal Middle Aged [MeSH]
lokal Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery [MeSH]
lokal Reflux
lokal Hernia repair
lokal Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects [MeSH]
lokal Surgical Mesh [MeSH]
lokal Recurrence [MeSH]
lokal Original Article
lokal Hernia, Hiatal/complications [MeSH]
lokal Herniamed
lokal Male [MeSH]
lokal Herniorrhaphy/instrumentation [MeSH]
lokal Hiatal hernia
lokal Propensity Score [MeSH]
lokal Herniorrhaphy/methods [MeSH]
lokal Hot Topics in Hiatal Hernia
lokal Registries [MeSH]
1000 Fächerklassifikation (DDC)
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2947-5689|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/R2xhdXNlciwgUC4=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/QWRvbGYsIEQu|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/S2lyY2hob2ZmLCBQLg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/S8O2Y2tlcmxpbmcsIEYu
1000 Hinweis
  • DeepGreen-ID: 5f456fd1f97e4e24989538119d710ae8 ; metadata provieded by: DeepGreen (https://www.oa-deepgreen.de/api/v1/), LIVIVO search scope life sciences (http://z3950.zbmed.de:6210/livivo), Crossref Unified Resource API (https://api.crossref.org/swagger-ui/index.html), to.science.api (https://frl.publisso.de/), ZDB JSON-API (beta) (https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/api/), lobid - Dateninfrastruktur für Bibliotheken (https://lobid.org/resources/search)
1000 Label
1000 Förderer
  1. Ethicon |
  2. KARL STORZ |
  3. BD Biosciences |
  4. Universität Basel |
1000 Fördernummer
  1. -
  2. -
  3. -
  4. -
1000 Förderprogramm
  1. -
  2. -
  3. -
  4. -
1000 Dateien
1000 Förderung
  1. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer Ethicon |
    1000 Förderprogramm -
    1000 Fördernummer -
  2. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer KARL STORZ |
    1000 Förderprogramm -
    1000 Fördernummer -
  3. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer BD Biosciences |
    1000 Förderprogramm -
    1000 Fördernummer -
  4. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer Universität Basel |
    1000 Förderprogramm -
    1000 Fördernummer -
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6520341.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2025-07-06T00:18:08.176+0200
1000 Erstellt von 322
1000 beschreibt frl:6520341
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2025-08-11T08:02:25.941+0200
1000 Objekt bearb. Mon Aug 11 08:02:25 CEST 2025
1000 Vgl. frl:6520341
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6520341 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source