|
1000
|
Abstract/Summary
|
-
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Background</jats:title>
<jats:p>The etiology of sleep bruxism in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients is not yet fully clarified. This prospective clinical study aimed to investigate the connection between probable sleep bruxism, electromyographic muscle tone, and respiratory sleep patterns recorded during polysomnography.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Methods</jats:title>
<jats:p>106 patients with OSA (74 males, 31 females, mean age: 56.1 ± 11.4 years) were divided into two groups (sleep bruxism: SB; no sleep bruxism: NSB). Probable SB were based on the AASM criteria: self-report of clenching/grinding, orofacial symptoms upon awakening, abnormal tooth wear and hypertrophy of the masseter muscle. Both groups underwent clinical examination for painful muscle symptoms aligned with Temporomandibular Disorders Diagnostic Criteria (DC/TMD), such as myalgia, myofascial pain, and headache attributed to temporomandibular disorder. Additionally, non-complaint positive muscle palpation and orofacial-related limitations (Jaw Functional Limited Scale-20: JFLS-20) were assessed. A one-night polysomnography with electromyographic masseter muscle tone (EMG) measurement was performed. Descriptive data, inter-group comparisons and multivariate logistic regression were calculated.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Results</jats:title>
<jats:p>OSA patients had a 37.1% prevalence of SB. EMG muscle tone (N1-N3, REM; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.001) and the number of hypopneas (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.042) were significantly higher in the sleep bruxism group. While measures like apnea–hypopnea-index (AHI), respiratory-disturbance-index (RDI), apnea index (AI), hypopnea-index (HI), number of arousals, and heart rate (1/min) were elevated in sleep bruxers, the differences were not statistically significant. There was no difference in sleep efficiency (SE; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.403). Non-complaint masseter muscle palpation (61.5%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.015) and myalgia (41%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.010) were significant higher in SB patients. Multivariate logistic regression showed a significant contribution of EMG muscle tone and JFLS-20 to bruxism risk.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title>
<jats:p>Increased EMG muscle tone and orofacial limitations can predict sleep bruxism in OSA patients. Besides, SB patients suffer more from sleep disorder breathing. Thus, sleep bruxism seems to be not only an oral health related problem in obstructive apnea. Consequently, interdisciplinary interventions are crucial for effectively treating these patients.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Trial registration</jats:title>
<jats:p>The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Philipps-University Marburg (reg. no. 13/22—2022) and registered at the “German Clinical Trial Register, DRKS” (DRKS0002959).</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
|
