Download
00402_2024_Article_5273.pdf 1,28MB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Aseptic midterm survival rates between different cemented tibial stem designs in hinged total knee arthroplasty: a 6-year evaluation from the German Arthroplasty Registry
1000 Autor/in
  1. Maslaris, Alexander |
  2. Grimberg, Alexander |
  3. Melsheimer, Oliver |
  4. Tsiridis, Elefterios |
  5. Matziolis, Georg |
1000 Verlag Springer Berlin Heidelberg
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2024
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2024-04-16
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 144(5):2283-2295
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2024
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05273-x |
  • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11093826/ |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Begutachtungsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Introduction</jats:title> <jats:p>The rate of revision TKA and thus the use of hinged implants (HI) steadily rises. Aseptic loosening lies on the top of the failure patterns. However, no evidence exists until now based on national scale high-caseloads that analyzes the impact of cemented HI stem-design on aseptic survival rates.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>Data on aseptic HI-revisions with full-cemented tibia-stems were conducted from the German Arthroplasty Registry. Cases were divided in primary HI (PHI) and HI used in revision operations (RHI). Endpoint was a new revision following either a PHI or an RHI. The impact of stem conicity (conical vs. cylindrical), diameter (≤ 13 mm vs. &gt; 13 mm), length (≤ 90 mm vs. &gt; 90 mm) and offset on the 6-Year-Cumulative-Aseptic-Revision-Rate (6Y-CARR) was estimated via Kaplan–Meier curve and compared between groups via Log-Rank-Tests.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>3953 PHI and 2032 RHI fulfilled inclusion-criteria. Stem conicity had no impact on 6Y-CARR (p = 0.08 and p = 0.8). Diameter &gt; 13 mm hat an impact on PHI (p = 0.05) with lower 6Y-CARR but not on RHI (p = 0.2). Length &gt; 90 mm showed significantly worst 6Y-CARR in PHI (p = 0.0001) but not in RHI (p = 0.3). Offset-stems showed significantly better 6Y-CARR in PHI (p = 0.04), but not in RHI (p = 0.7).</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>There was no significant impact of the cemented tibia-stem conicity on 6Y-CARR, neither in PHI nor in RHI. The effect of length, diameter and offset on the 6Y-CARR observed in the PHI, was not detectable in the more complex RHI-cases reflecting its limited clinical relevance by itself in more multifactorial backgrounds. Therefore, results must be interpreted with caution due to considerable system-effects and different utilization-scenarios.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Tibia/surgery [MeSH]
lokal Aged [MeSH]
lokal Cemented revision total knee arthroplasty
lokal Germany/epidemiology [MeSH]
lokal Tibial stems
lokal Cemented stems
lokal Stem conicity
lokal Male [MeSH]
lokal Stem design
lokal Stem offset
lokal Aseptic survival rate
lokal Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods [MeSH]
lokal Prosthesis Design [MeSH]
lokal Reoperation/statistics
lokal Female [MeSH]
lokal Knee Arthroplasty
lokal Knee Prosthesis [MeSH]
lokal Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/instrumentation [MeSH]
lokal Humans [MeSH]
lokal Stem length
lokal Bone Cements [MeSH]
lokal Conical stems
lokal Middle Aged [MeSH]
lokal Prosthesis Failure [MeSH]
lokal Cumulative aseptic revision rate
lokal Stem diameter
lokal Registries [MeSH]
1000 Fächerklassifikation (DDC)
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3120-2057|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/R3JpbWJlcmcsIEFsZXhhbmRlcg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/TWVsc2hlaW1lciwgT2xpdmVy|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/VHNpcmlkaXMsIEVsZWZ0ZXJpb3M=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/TWF0emlvbGlzLCBHZW9yZw==
1000 Hinweis
  • DeepGreen-ID: 130e31b36aac46f8be1facc41c01af81 ; metadata provieded by: DeepGreen (https://www.oa-deepgreen.de/api/v1/), LIVIVO search scope life sciences (http://z3950.zbmed.de:6210/livivo), Crossref Unified Resource API (https://api.crossref.org/swagger-ui/index.html), to.science.api (https://frl.publisso.de/), ZDB JSON-API (beta) (https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/api/), lobid - Dateninfrastruktur für Bibliotheken (https://lobid.org/resources/search) ;
1000 Label
1000 Förderer
  1. Universitätsklinikum Jena |
1000 Fördernummer
  1. -
1000 Förderprogramm
  1. -
1000 Dateien
1000 Förderung
  1. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer Universitätsklinikum Jena |
    1000 Förderprogramm -
    1000 Fördernummer -
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6522551.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2025-07-06T15:29:11.228+0200
1000 Erstellt von 322
1000 beschreibt frl:6522551
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2025-08-04T08:18:36.662+0200
1000 Objekt bearb. Mon Aug 04 08:18:36 CEST 2025
1000 Vgl. frl:6522551
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6522551 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source