Download
Forberger_BIPS_35428887_Postprint.pdf 1,25MB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Scoping review of existing evaluations of smokeless tobacco control policies: What is known about countries covered, level of jurisdictions, target groups studied and instruments evaluated?
1000 Autor/in
  1. Forberger, Sarah |
  2. Khan, Zohaib |
  3. Ahmad, Fayaz |
  4. Ahmed, Furqan |
  5. Frense, Jennifer |
  6. Kampfmann, Teresa |
  7. Ullah, Safat |
  8. Dogar, Omara |
  9. Siddiqi, Kamran |
  10. Zeeb, Hajo |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2022
1000 LeibnizOpen
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2022-04-16
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 24(9):1344–1354
1000 FRL-Sammlung
1000 Embargo
  • 2023-04-16
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntac102 |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Begutachtungsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • OBJECTIVE: The implementation of smokeless tobacco control policies lags behind those for smoking. This scoping review summarises the studies that evaluated public policies on smokeless tobacco regulation (SLT) and provides an overview of the jurisdictional level, target groups and policy instruments. METHODS: Seven databases were systematically searched for studies reporting on public policies regulating SLT. All studies were independently screened by two reviewers. Data extraction was performed using a predefined extraction form. Extraction was replicated for 10% of the identified studies for quality assurance. A narrative synthesis of the included studies was used to analyse and interpret the data. The protocol was published beforehand with the OSF. RESULTS: 40 articles comprising 41 studies were included. Most of the studies reported in the articles were conducted in the USA (n=17) or India (n=14). Most studies reported outcomes for students (n=8), retailers/sellers (n=8) and users/former users (n=5). The impact of public policies on smokeless tobacco use in general was most frequently assessed (n=9), followed by the impact of taxes (n=7), product bans (n=6), sales/advertising bans near educational institutions (n=4) and health warnings (n=3) on consumer behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: There are major gaps in the evaluation of smokeless tobacco regulation studies that need to be filled by further research to understand the observed outcomes. WHO reporting on FCTC implementation should be linked to studies evaluating smokeless tobacco control measures at all levels of jurisdictions and in countries that are not members of the WHO FCTC or do not provide data. IMPLICATION: Large gaps in the evaluation of SLT control policies exists. For some countries, WHO FCTC evaluations are available for different levels of jurisdictions. In countries with a strong federal structure, there is a lack of data that goes beyond the national level to provide a more detailed look at compliance, indirect effects or implementation gaps. More research is needed at all levels of jurisdictions, that add to the work of the WHO to understand what works for which target group, how the different levels of jurisdiction interact, how the real-world context can be incorporated, and what indirect effects may occur.
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Policy implementation
lokal Smokeless tobacco
lokal WHO FCTC
lokal Policy evaluation
lokal National control policy
lokal Tobacco control policy
1000 Fächerklassifikation (DDC)
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7169-675X|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/S2hhbiwgWm9oYWli|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/QWhtYWQsIEZheWF6|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8949-5489|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/RnJlbnNlLCBKZW5uaWZlcg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/S2FtcGZtYW5uLCBUZXJlc2E=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/VWxsYWgsIFNhZmF0|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/RG9nYXIsIE9tYXJh|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/U2lkZGlxaSwgS2FtcmFu|https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7509-242X
1000 Label
1000 Förderer
  1. Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst |
  2. National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) |
  3. Government of the United Kingdom |
1000 Fördernummer
  1. 574 030 10; 575 236 44
  2. 17/63/76
  3. -
1000 Förderprogramm
  1. -
  2. -
  3. -
1000 Dateien
  1. Nutzungsvereinbarung
  2. Oxford_self-archiving-policy
1000 Förderung
  1. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst |
    1000 Förderprogramm -
    1000 Fördernummer 574 030 10; 575 236 44
  2. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) |
    1000 Förderprogramm -
    1000 Fördernummer 17/63/76
  3. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer Government of the United Kingdom |
    1000 Förderprogramm -
    1000 Fördernummer -
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6433162.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2022-04-22T10:54:19.077+0200
1000 Erstellt von 266
1000 beschreibt frl:6433162
1000 Bearbeitet von 25
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2023-04-21T07:53:15.688+0200
1000 Objekt bearb. Fri Apr 21 07:53:14 CEST 2023
1000 Vgl. frl:6433162
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6433162 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source