Download
s11270-020-04881-8.pdf 9,44MB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Comparison of Spider Web and Moss Bag Biomonitoring to Detect Sources of Airborne Trace Elements
1000 Autor/in
  1. van Laaten, Neele |
  2. Merten, Dirk |
  3. von Tümpling, Wolf |
  4. Schäfer, Thorsten |
  5. Pirrung, Michael |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2020
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2020-09-30
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 231(10):512
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2020
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04881-8 |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • Atmospheric particulate matter has become a major issue in urban areas from both a health and an environmental perspective. In this context, biomonitoring methods are a potential complement to classical monitoring methods like impactor samplers, being spatially limited due to higher costs. Monitoring using spider webs is compared with the more common moss bag technique in this study, focusing on mass fractions and ratios of elements and the applicability for source identification. Spider webs and moss bags with Hypnum cupressiforme were sampled at the same 15 locations with different types of traffic in the city of Jena, Germany. In the samples, mass fractions of 35 elements, mainly trace metals, were determined using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) after aqua regia digestion. Significantly higher mass fractions in spider webs than in moss bags were found, even after a much shorter exposure period, and could not be ascribed completely to a diluting effect by the biological material in the samples. Different mechanisms of particle retention by the two materials are therefore assumed. More significant correlations between elements have been found for the spider web dataset. Those patterns allow for an identification of different sources of particulate matter (e.g. geogenic dust, brake wear), while correlations between elements in the moss bags show a rather general anthropogenic influence. Therefore, it is recommended to use spider webs for the short-term detection of local sources while moss bag biomonitoring is a good tool to show a broader, long-term anthropogenic influence.
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal Article
lokal Biomonitoring
lokal Urban particulate matter
lokal Spider webs
lokal Heavy metals
lokal Moss bags
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8880-6257|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8596-2828|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/dm9uIFTDvG1wbGluZywgV29sZg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/U2Now6RmZXIsIFRob3JzdGVu|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/UGlycnVuZywgTWljaGFlbA==
1000 Hinweis
  • DeepGreen-ID: 4177c3b356f64ea2804477a501ac6a27 ; metadata provieded by: DeepGreen (https://www.oa-deepgreen.de/api/v1/), LIVIVO search scope life sciences (http://z3950.zbmed.de:6210/livivo), Crossref Unified Resource API (https://api.crossref.org/swagger-ui/index.html), to.science.api (https://frl.publisso.de/), ZDB JSON-API (beta) (https://zeitschriftendatenbank.de/api/), lobid - Dateninfrastruktur für Bibliotheken (https://lobid.org/resources/search)
1000 Label
1000 Dateien
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6468642.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2023-11-17T17:37:42.989+0100
1000 Erstellt von 322
1000 beschreibt frl:6468642
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2023-12-01T08:14:12.462+0100
1000 Objekt bearb. Fri Dec 01 08:14:12 CET 2023
1000 Vgl. frl:6468642
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6468642 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source