Download
fsn3.1597.pdf 491,22KB
WeightNameValue
1000 Titel
  • Thermal processing methods differentially affect the protein quality of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)
1000 Autor/in
  1. Nosworthy, Matthew G |
  2. Medina, Gerardo |
  3. Franczyk, Adam J |
  4. Neufeld, Jason |
  5. Appah, Paulyn |
  6. Utioh, Alphonsus |
  7. Frohlich, Peter |
  8. Tar'an, Bunyamin |
  9. House, James |
1000 Erscheinungsjahr 2020
1000 Publikationstyp
  1. Artikel |
1000 Online veröffentlicht
  • 2020-05-12
1000 Erschienen in
1000 Quellenangabe
  • 8(6):2950-2958
1000 Copyrightjahr
  • 2020
1000 Lizenz
1000 Verlagsversion
  • https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1597 |
1000 Publikationsstatus
1000 Begutachtungsstatus
1000 Sprache der Publikation
1000 Abstract/Summary
  • Chickpea is a widely produced pulse crop, but requires processing prior to human consumption. Protein bioavailability and amino acid quantity of chickpea flour can be altered by multiple factors including processing method. For this reason, the protein quality of processed chickpea flour was determined using in vivo and in vitro analyses for processed chickpeas. Processing differentially affected the protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) of chickpeas with extruded chickpea (83.8) having a higher PDCAAS score than both cooked (75.2) and baked (80.03). Interestingly, the digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) value of baked chickpea (0.84) was higher compared to both extruded (0.82) and cooked (0.78). The protein efficiency ratio, another measure of protein quality, was significantly higher for extruded chickpea than baked chickpea (p < .01). In vivo and in vitro analysis of protein quality were well correlated (R2 = .9339). These results demonstrated that under certain circumstances in vitro methods could replace the use of animals to determine protein quality.
1000 Sacherschließung
lokal digestible indispensable amino acid score
lokal protein efficiency ratio
lokal processing
lokal cultivar
lokal protein digestibility‐corrected amino acid score
1000 Fächerklassifikation (DDC)
1000 Liste der Beteiligten
  1. https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/Tm9zd29ydGh5LCBNYXR0aGV3IEc=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/TWVkaW5hLCBHZXJhcmRv|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/RnJhbmN6eWssIEFkYW0gSg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/TmV1ZmVsZCwgSmFzb24=|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/QXBwYWgsIFBhdWx5bg==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/VXRpb2gsIEFscGhvbnN1cw==|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/RnJvaGxpY2gsIFBldGVy|https://frl.publisso.de/adhoc/uri/VGFyJ2FuLCBCdW55YW1pbg==|https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1389-5491
1000 Label
1000 Förderer
  1. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada |
  2. University of Saskatchewan |
1000 Fördernummer
  1. -
  2. -
1000 Förderprogramm
  1. Growing Forward 2—Pulse Science Cluster program
  2. Global Institute for Food Security
1000 Dateien
1000 Förderung
  1. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada |
    1000 Förderprogramm Growing Forward 2—Pulse Science Cluster program
    1000 Fördernummer -
  2. 1000 joinedFunding-child
    1000 Förderer University of Saskatchewan |
    1000 Förderprogramm Global Institute for Food Security
    1000 Fördernummer -
1000 Objektart article
1000 Beschrieben durch
1000 @id frl:6430623.rdf
1000 Erstellt am 2021-12-09T11:08:18.000+0100
1000 Erstellt von 286
1000 beschreibt frl:6430623
1000 Bearbeitet von 286
1000 Zuletzt bearbeitet 2021-12-09T11:09:34.165+0100
1000 Objekt bearb. Thu Dec 09 11:09:09 CET 2021
1000 Vgl. frl:6430623
1000 Oai Id
  1. oai:frl.publisso.de:frl:6430623 |
1000 Sichtbarkeit Metadaten public
1000 Sichtbarkeit Daten public
1000 Gegenstand von

View source